Effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation on laser-evoked pain and brain activity

被引:0
作者
Benjamin Provencher
Stéphane Northon
Carlos Gevers Montoro
Julie O’Shaughnessy
Mathieu Piché
机构
[1] Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières,Department of Anatomy
[2] Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières,CogNAC Research Group
[3] Madrid College of Chiropractic,Department of Chiropractic
[4] Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières,undefined
来源
The Journal of Physiological Sciences | 2021年 / 71卷
关键词
Spinal manipulation; Hypoalgesia; Nociceptive fibers; Electroencephalography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the mechanisms underlying hypoalgesia induced by spinal manipulation (SM). Eighty-two healthy volunteers were assigned to one of the four intervention groups: no intervention, SM at T4 (homosegmental to pain), SM at T8 (heterosegmental to pain) or light mechanical stimulus at T4 (placebo). Eighty laser stimuli were applied on back skin at T4 to evoke pain and brain activity related to Aδ- and C-fibers activation. The intervention was performed after 40 stimuli. Laser pain was decreased by SM at T4 (p = 0.028) but not T8 (p = 0.13), compared with placebo. However, brain activity related to Aδ-fibers activation was not significantly modulated (all p > 0.05), while C-fiber activity could not be measured reliably. This indicates that SM produces segmental hypoalgesia through inhibition of nociceptive processes that are independent of Aδ fibers. It remains to be clarified whether the effect is mediated by the inhibition of C-fiber activity.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 316 条
[1]  
Arendt-Nielsen L(2015)Central sensitization in humans: assessment and pharmacology Handb Exp Pharmacol 227 79-102
[2]  
Aspinall SL(2019)No difference in pressure pain threshold and temporal summation after lumbar spinal manipulation compared to sham: a randomised controlled trial in adults with low back pain Musculoskelet Sci Pract 43 18-25
[3]  
Jacques A(2002)Human brain oscillatory activity phase-locked to painful electrical stimulations: a multi-channel EEG study Hum Brain Mapp 15 112-123
[4]  
Leboeuf-Yde C(2018)Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy: modeling an approach J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 48 8-18
[5]  
Etherington SJ(2017)Placebo mechanisms of manual therapy: a sheep in wolf's clothing? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47 301-304
[6]  
Walker BF(2008)The influence of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9 19-1303
[7]  
Babiloni C(2009)Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Phys Ther 89 1292-148
[8]  
Babiloni F(2014)Spinal manipulative therapy-specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999) J Pain 15 136-446
[9]  
Carducci F(2011)Immediate reduction in temporal sensory summation after thoracic spinal manipulation Spine J 11 440-972
[10]  
Cincotti F(2017)The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: an experimental study J Pain Res 10 965-166