Comparative volumetric analysis of the extent of resection of molecularly and histologically distinct low grade gliomas and its role on survival

被引:0
作者
Chikezie I. Eseonu
Francisco Eguia
Karim ReFaey
Oscar Garcia
Fausto J. Rodriguez
Kaisorn Chaichana
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins University,Department of Neurological Surgery and Oncology Outcomes Lab
[2] Johns Hopkins University,Department of Pathology
[3] Mayo Clinic,Brain Tumor Stem Cell Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery
[4] Florida,undefined
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2017年 / 134卷
关键词
Low grade glioma; Extent of resection; Survival; Molecular markers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The authors investigate the role of extent of resection (EOR) and genetic markers on patient outcome and survival for LGGs. We conducted a retrospective cohort between 2005 and 2015, of 109 adult patients who underwent surgery for a LGG by a single surgeon. Volumetric computations of MRI studies were conducted to evaluate the EOR, and genetic markers (IDH1, 1p/19q co-deletion, and p53) were assessed and their effects on survival and neurological outcome were evaluated. The median EOR was 88.1%. Permanent postoperative neurological deficits were seen in 4.6% of patients. EOR was a significant predictor for both overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.979, 95% CI 0.961–0.980, p = 0.029) and progression free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.982, 95% CI 0.968–0.997, p = 0.018). Malignant progression free survival (MPFS) was predicted by the 1p/19q co-deletion (HR = 0.148, 95% CI 0.019–1.148, p = 0.048). Patients with EOR of 100% had a significantly better OS than EOR less than 90% (p = 0.038). Patients with an EOR of at least 76% had a better OS than EOR less than 76% (p = 0.025). Patients with an EOR of at least 71% had a better PFS than EOR less than 71% (p = 0.030). Preoperative tumor volume was found to have significant association with EOR (R2 = 0.049, p = 0.031). Increased EOR is associated with improved OS and PFS survival outcomes, while 1p/19q co-deletion provides improved MPFS. Understanding both surgical resections and molecular markers of the tumor are important for effective management of LGG patients.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 74
页数:9
相关论文
共 367 条
[1]  
Roelz R(2016)Residual tumor volume as best outcome predictor in low grade glioma—a nine-years near-randomized survey of surgery vs. biopsy Sci Rep 6 32286-342
[2]  
Strohmaier D(2015)New concepts in the management of diffuse low-grade glioma: proposal of a multistage and individualized therapeutic approach Neurooncol 17 332-1133
[3]  
Jabbarli R(2010)Guidelines on management of low-grade gliomas: report of an EFNS-EANO Task Force Eur J Neurol 17 1124-1888
[4]  
Kraeutle R(2012)Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas JAMA 308 1881-1345
[5]  
Egger K(2008)Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas J Clin Oncol 26 1338-1233
[6]  
Coenen VA(2005)Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance Cancer 103 1227-587
[7]  
Weyerbrock A(1998)Supratentorial low grade astrocytoma: prognostic factors, dedifferentiation, and the issue of early versus late surgery J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64 581-116
[8]  
Reinacher PC(2000)Analysis of prognostic and survival factors related to treatment of low-grade astrocytomas in adults Int Soc Cell 58 108-559
[9]  
Duffau H(1993)Supratentorial low-grade astrocytomas in adults Neurosurgery 32 554-1301
[10]  
Taillandier L(1997)Supratentorial low-grade glioma in adults: an analysis of prognostic factors and timing of radiation J Clin Oncol 15 1294-2276