Of Dreamliners and Drinking Water: Developing Risk Regulation and a Safety Culture for Direct Potable Reuse

被引:0
作者
Christian Binz
Noosha Bronte Razavian
Michael Kiparsky
机构
[1] Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology,Wheeler Water Institute
[2] UC Berkeley School of Law,undefined
[3] NSF Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt),undefined
来源
Water Resources Management | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
Water reuse; Water recycling; Safety culture; Wastewater; Water treatment; Drinking water; Urban water; Innovation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Direct potable water reuse (DPR), the injection of highly purified wastewater into drinking water systems, is among the newest, and most controversial, methods for augmenting water supplies. DPR is garnering increasing interest, but does not come without risks. This paper examines the notion that emerging regulation of DPR may lack sufficient attention to a particular class of risks: catastrophic risks with low probabilities of occurrence, but high consequences. It may be instructive for proponents of DPR that such consequences have materialized in other industries, with damage to human welfare and to the industries themselves. We develop brief histories of risk regulation from the aviation, offshore oil, and nuclear industries, drawing out relevant lessons for the emerging DPR field. We argue that proponents of DPR could benefit from proactively developing a safety culture in DPR utilities and establishing an effective industry-wide auditing organization that investigates unanticipated system failures. Developing independent oversight for DPR operation could ensure that stringent quality and management requirements are set and enforced, and that any system failures or “near misses” are investigated and adequately responded to.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 525
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Bolong N(2009)A Review of the Effects of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater and Options for their Removal Desalination 239 229-246
  • [2] Ismail A(1989)Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications J Policy Anal Manage 8 565-592
  • [3] Salim MR(1991)The Structure of Employee Attitudes to Safety: A European Example Work Stress 5 93-106
  • [4] Matsuura T(2011)Geothermal Technology in Australia: Investigating Social Acceptance Energ Policy 39 6301-6307
  • [5] Camerer CF(2011)Here be dragons… exploring the ‘unknown unknowns Futures 43 196-201
  • [6] Kunreuther H(2013)Potable Reuse Treatment Trains Throughout the World J Water Supply Res Technol 62 321-338
  • [7] Cox S(2000)The Nature of Safety Culture: A Review of Theory and Research Saf Sci 34 215-257
  • [8] Cox T(2015)Beyond User Acceptance: A Legitimacy Framework for Potable Water Reuse in California Environ Sci Technol 49 7552-7561
  • [9] Dowd A(2007)Environmental Disasters as Risk Regulation Catalysts? the Role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile Island in Shaping US Environmental Law J Risk Uncertain 35 17-43
  • [10] Boughen N(1979)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk Econometrica 47 263-291