Can local Minjingu phosphate rock replace superphosphate on acid soils in Tanzania?

被引:0
作者
C. Szilas
J. M. R. Semoka
O. K. Borggaard
机构
[1] Watertech,Soil Science Department
[2] Sokoine University of Agriculture,Department of Natural Sciences
[3] Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University,undefined
来源
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2007年 / 77卷
关键词
Agronomic performance; Fertilizer; Maize yield; Competitiveness; P deficiency; Multiconstraint crop production;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Locally occurring Minjinju phosphate rock (MPR) in direct application as P source for maize production was compared with water-soluble imported, processed triplesuperphosphate (TSP) in a field study over three seasons on ten important, low-fertility agricultural soils throughout sub-humid to humid Tanzania. Except for the first season, where MPR was slightly inferior to TSP, direct application of MPR gave the same yields as TSP indicating that MPR can replace TSP on acid, severely weathered tropical soils low to very low in available P and exchangeable Ca and with high to very high phosphate adsorption capacity. Similar response for granulated and non-granulated MPR enables replacement of the dusty finely powdered MPR by the user-friendly granulated form. However, P fertilization improved maize yields on only three soils because plant growth is also limited by other factors than P, such as frost (one site) and lack of water and other nutrients, e.g. B, Cu and Mg. Apart from saving foreign currency, replacement of TSP by MPR has additional advantages because MPR contains calcium carbonate (lime effect), Mg, K, Cu and Zn. On the other hand, economy constrains MPR use as MPR was found to be economically competitive with TSP only in areas within about 700 km from the mine, mainly because of current very high transportation costs.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 268
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Bolan NS(1990)A review of use of phosphate rocks as fertilizers for direct application in Australia and New Zealand Aust J Expt Agric 30 297-313
[2]  
White RE(2004)Estimation of phosphate adsorption capacity by means of a pedotransfer function Geoderma 11 55-61
[3]  
Hedley MJ(1978)A simple chemical method for evaluating the agronomic potential of granulated phosphate rock Soil Sci Soc Am J 42 615-617
[4]  
Borggaard OK(1995)Factors affecting the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock for direct application Fert Res 41 227-234
[5]  
Szilas C(1997)Phosphorus acquisition and cycling in crop and pasture systems in low fertility tropical soils Plant Soil 196 289-294
[6]  
Gimsing AL(2003)Experimental study of igneous and sedimentary apatite dissolution: Control of pH, distance from equilibrium, and temperature on dissolution rates Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67 2949-2963
[7]  
Rasmussen LH(2004)Phosphorus runoff from agricultural land and direct fertilizer effects: a review J Environ Qual 33 1954-1972
[8]  
Chien SH(1986)Agronomic value of unacidulated and partially acidulated phosphate rocks indigenous to the tropics Adv Agron 40 89-140
[9]  
Hammond LL(2006)Maize yield response and nutrient uptake after micronutrient application on a volcanic soil Agron J 98 402-406
[10]  
Chien SH(1991)Effectiveness of Minjingu phosphate rock as a source of phosphorus for maize in some soils of Morogoro, Tanzania Zimbabwe J Agric Res 29 27-37