The Race Is On: Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Goes Global

被引:0
|
作者
Mindy C. DeRouen
Jennifer B. McCormick
Jason Owen-Smith
Christopher Thomas Scott
机构
[1] Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics,Program on Stem Cells in Society
[2] Mayo Clinic,General Internal Medicine & Health Care PolicyResearch
[3] University of Michigan,Sociology and Organizational Studies
[4] University of British Columbia,The National Core for Neuroethics
来源
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports | 2012年 / 8卷
关键词
Policy; Ethics; Law; Human embryonic stem cell research; Induced pluripotent stem cells; NIH; Obama; G.W. Bush;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
More nations are joining the human embryonic stem cell (hESC) “race” by aggressively publishing in the peer-reviewed journals. Here we present data on the international use and distribution of hESC using a dataset taken from the primary research literature. We extracted these papers from a comprehensive dataset of articles using hESC and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC). We find that the rate of publication by US-based authors is slowing in comparison to international labs, and then declines over the final year of the period 2008–2010. Non-US authors published more frequently and at a significantly higher rate, significantly increasing the number of their papers. In addition, international labs use a more diverse set of hESC lines and Obama-era additions are used more in non-US locations. Even considering the flood of new lines in the US and abroad, we see that researchers continue to rely on a few lines derived before the turn of the century. These data suggest “embargo” effects from restrictive policies on the US stem cell field. Over time, non-US labs have freely used lines on the US registries, while federally funded US scientists have been limited to using those lines approved by the NIH.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1047
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human embryonic stem cell research - a marginal and yet unpleasant problem for Austrian (bio)politics
    Hager, Josef
    AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 53 (01):
  • [32] Rethink the patentability of human embryonic stem cell research findings: Relaxation based on benefit weighing
    Chen, Jiajv
    Li, Wei
    STEM CELL REPORTS, 2021, 16 (08): : 1868 - 1873
  • [33] Overcoming embryonic exceptionalism? Lessons from analyzing human stem cell research regulation in Israel
    Prainsack, Barbara
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2011, 30 (03) : 267 - 277
  • [34] Gene expression analysis of a new source of human oocytes and embryos for research and human embryonic stem cell derivation
    Sneddon, Sharon F.
    DeSousa, Paul A.
    Arnesen, Ruth E.
    Lieberman, Brian A.
    Kimber, Susan J.
    Brison, Daniel R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : 1410 - 1415
  • [35] Ethical Assessment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research According to Turkish Muslim Scholars: First Critical Analysis and Some Reflections
    Karakaya, Ahmet
    Ilkilic, Ilhan
    STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS, 2016, 12 (04) : 385 - 393
  • [36] An ethical analysis of the policy implications in the united states emerging from the relationship between human genomics and embryonic stem cell research
    Magill, G
    ETHICS OF HUMAN GENETICS: CHALLENGES OF THE (POST) GENOMIC ERA, 2002, : 191 - 201
  • [37] Ethical Assessment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research According to Turkish Muslim Scholars: First Critical Analysis and Some Reflections
    Ahmet Karakaya
    Ilhan Ilkilic
    Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 2016, 12 : 385 - 393
  • [38] Embryonic stem-cell research and the moral status of embryos
    Chu, G
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 33 (11) : 530 - 531
  • [39] Support for embryonic stem cell research among infertility patients
    Jain, Tarun
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (03) : 506 - 512
  • [40] Human embryonic stem cell science and policy: The case of Iran
    Saniei, Mansooreh
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 98 : 345 - 350