The 11B(p,α)8Be → α + α and the 11B(α,α)11B Reactions at Energies Below 5.4 MeV

被引:0
|
作者
M. C. Spraker
M. W. Ahmed
M. A. Blackston
N. Brown
R. H. France
S. S. Henshaw
B. A. Perdue
R. M. Prior
P.-N. Seo
S. Stave
H. R. Weller
机构
[1] North Georgia College and State University,
[2] Duke University and TUNL,undefined
[3] North Carolina Central University,undefined
[4] Oak Ridge National Laboratory,undefined
[5] Georgia College and State University,undefined
[6] Los Alamos National Laboratory,undefined
[7] University of Virginia and TUNL,undefined
[8] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,undefined
来源
Journal of Fusion Energy | 2012年 / 31卷
关键词
Low energy nuclear physics; Aneutronic fusion; Fusion; Triple alpha; Energy production; B; Alpha; Proton fusion; Alpha elastic scattering; Cross section; Angular distribution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurements of the absolute cross section and angular distributions for the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{11} \hbox{B}(p,\alpha)^{8}{\text{Be}}\rightarrow\alpha+\alpha$$\end{document} and the 11B(α,α)11B reactions have been performed from 0.15 to 3.8 MeV for the 11B(p,α) study and from 2 to 5.4 MeV for the 11B(α,α) reaction. The absolute cross sections are presented in terms of the total number of α-particles detected in order to avoid uncertainties due to ambiguities in the number of alpha particles emitted in the reaction at a particular energy. The angular distributions of the 11B(p,α)8Be(2+) reaction were fit to a Legendre polynomial expansion and the coefficients are presented. Finally, the 11B(α,α)11B data were fit in terms of phase shifts (ignoring the spin of the target), providing a convenient representation of the elastic cross section data between 2 and 5.4 MeV.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The accuracy of δ11B measurements of foraminifers
    Ni, Yunyan
    Foster, Gavin L.
    Elliott, Tim
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2010, 274 (3-4) : 187 - 195
  • [32] Why waste 11b pound?
    不详
    CHEMICAL ENGINEER-LONDON, 1996, (623): : 27 - 27
  • [33] 11B TELEPHONE SWITCHING SYSTEM
    EKBERGH, E
    ELECTRICAL COMMUNICATION, 1968, 43 (04): : 329 - &
  • [34] Cluster rotational bands in 11B
    Danilov, A. N.
    Demyanova, A. S.
    Ogloblin, A. A.
    Belyaeva, T. L.
    Goncharov, S. A.
    Trzaska, W.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS 2015, 2016, 117
  • [36] The accuracy of δ11B measurements of foraminifera
    Ni, Y.
    Foster, G. L.
    Elliott, T.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 71 (15) : A715 - A715
  • [37] Philebus 11b: Good or the Good
    Rudebusch, George
    APEIRON-A JOURNAL FOR ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE, 2020, 53 (02): : 161 - 185
  • [38] Weak isoscalar response of 11B
    T. Kawabata
    H. Akimune
    H. Fujimura
    H. Fujita
    Y. Fujita
    M. Fujiwara
    K. Hara
    K. Y. Hara
    K. Hatanaka
    T. Ishikawa
    M. Itoh
    J. Kamiya
    M. Nakamura
    H. Sakaguchi
    Y. Shimbara
    H. Takeda
    A. Tamii
    T. Noro
    H. Toyokawa
    M. Uchida
    T. Wakasa
    Y. Yasuda
    H. P. Yoshida
    M. Yosoi
    Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2004, 67 : 1794 - 1798
  • [39] Weak isoscalar response of 11B
    Kawabata, T
    Akimune, H
    Fujimura, H
    Fujita, H
    Fujiwara, M
    Hara, K
    Hara, KY
    Hatanaka, K
    Ishikawa, T
    Itoh, M
    Kamiya, J
    Nakamura, M
    Sakaguchi, H
    Shimbara, Y
    Takeda, H
    Tamii, A
    Noro, T
    Toyokawa, H
    Uchida, M
    Wakasa, T
    Yasuda, Y
    Yoshida, HP
    Yosoi, M
    PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI, 2004, 67 (10) : 1794 - 1798
  • [40] 11B(3HE 6LI)8BE REACTION
    YOUNG, FC
    FORSYTH, PD
    MARION, JB
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1967, A 91 (01) : 209 - &