Autonomous surgery in the era of robotic urology: friend or foe of the future surgeon?

被引:0
作者
Martin J. Connor
Prokar Dasgupta
Hashim U. Ahmed
Asif Raza
机构
[1] Imperial College London,Division of Surgery, Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer
[2] Charing Cross Campus,Department of Urology
[3] Charing Cross Hospital,MRC Centre for Transplantation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine
[4] Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust,Department of Urology
[5] King’s College London,Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences
[6] London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust,undefined
[7] University of Plymouth,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Urology | 2020年 / 17卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite advances in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the past two decades, control of the robotic system currently remains under the command of a human surgeon. Historically, urology has pioneered new surgical techniques and technologies. Now, autonomous RAS is on the horizon and the first data from clinical trials of autonomous RAS in urology are being published. Automation takes control away from the surgeon but promises standardization of techniques, increased efficiency, potentially reduced complication rates and new ways of integrating intra-operative imaging. Preclinical and clinical evidence is emerging that supports the use of autonomous robotic-assisted urological surgery. Use of autonomous technologies in the operating theatre will directly affect the role of the urological surgeon. Integration of autonomous RAS can be viewed as a positive aid, but it might also be perceived as a threat to the future urological surgeon.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 649
页数:6
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Khadhouri S(2018)The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) radical prostatectomy audit 2014/2015 — an update on current practice and outcomes by centre and surgeon case-volume BJU Int. 121 886-892
[2]  
Rassweiler JJ(2017)Future of robotic surgery in urology BJU Int. 120 822-841
[3]  
Gilling P(2016)Aquablation–image-guided robot-assisted waterjet ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience BJU Int. 117 923-929
[4]  
Reuther R(2018)WATER: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of aquablation® vs transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia J. Urol. 199 1252-1261
[5]  
Kahokehr A(2017)Medical robotics — regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy Sci. Robot. 2 8638-325
[6]  
Fraundorfer M(2016)Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery Sci. Transl Med. 8 337ra64-1096
[7]  
Gilling P(2018)Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: a philosophical account Front. Robot. AI 5 15-69
[8]  
Yang G(1997)The Probot — an active robot for prostate resection Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 211 317-112
[9]  
Shademan A(2015)A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update Eur. Urol. 67 1066-1506
[10]  
Santoni de Sio F(2015)Image-guided robot-assisted prostate ablation using water jet-hydrodissection: initial study of a novel technology for benign prostatic hyperplasia J. Endourol. 29 63-1317