Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial

被引:0
作者
Michael Heuser
B. Douglas Smith
Walter Fiedler
Mikkael A. Sekeres
Pau Montesinos
Brian Leber
Akil Merchant
Cristina Papayannidis
José A. Pérez-Simón
Caroline J. Hoang
Thomas O’Brien
Weidong Wendy Ma
Mirjana Zeremski
Ashleigh O’Connell
Geoffrey Chan
Jorge E. Cortes
机构
[1] Hannover Medical School,Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation
[2] Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center,Department of Hematology and Oncology
[3] University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf,Division of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
[4] University of Miami,Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina (IbiS)/CSIC/CIBERONC)
[5] Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe,undefined
[6] CIBERONC,undefined
[7] Instituto Carlos III,undefined
[8] Juravinski Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences,undefined
[9] Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute,undefined
[10] Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,undefined
[11] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna,undefined
[12] Universidad de Sevilla,undefined
[13] Pfizer Inc,undefined
[14] University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
[15] Georgia Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Annals of Hematology | 2021年 / 100卷
关键词
Acute myeloid leukemia; Clinical trial; Glasdegib; Secondary acute myeloid leukemia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This analysis from the phase II BRIGHT AML 1003 trial reports the long-term efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized (2:1) patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (de novo, n = 38; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 40) or LDAC alone (de novo, n = 18; secondary acute myeloid leukemia, n = 20). At the time of analysis, 90% of patients had died, with the longest follow-up since randomization 36 months. The combination of glasdegib and LDAC conferred superior overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone; hazard ratio (HR) 0.495; (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.325–0.752); p = 0.0004; median OS was 8.3 versus 4.3 months. Improvement in OS was consistent across cytogenetic risk groups. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, a survival trend with glasdegib + LDAC was observed in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.720; 95% CI 0.395–1.312; p = 0.14; median OS 6.6 vs 4.3 months) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (HR 0.287; 95% CI 0.151–0.548; p < 0.0001; median OS 9.1 vs 4.1 months). The incidence of adverse events in the glasdegib + LDAC arm decreased after 90 days’ therapy: 83.7% versus 98.7% during the first 90 days. Glasdegib + LDAC versus LDAC alone continued to demonstrate superior OS in patients with acute myeloid leukemia; the clinical benefit with glasdegib + LDAC was particularly prominent in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01546038.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1194
页数:13
相关论文
共 403 条
[1]  
Harris NL(1999)World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting–Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997 J Clin Oncol 17 3835-3849
[2]  
Jaffe ES(2004)The influence of age on prognosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia differs according to cytogenetic subgroups Haematologica 89 1082-1090
[3]  
Diebold J(2010)Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials Blood 116 354-365
[4]  
Flandrin G(2010)Reasons for treating secondary AML as de novo AML Eur J Haematol 85 217-226
[5]  
Muller-Hermelink HK(2011)The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML Blood 117 2137-2145
[6]  
Vardiman J(2015)Characterization and prognostic features of secondary acute myeloid leukemia in a population-based setting: a report from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry Am J Hematol 90 208-214
[7]  
Lister TA(2009)Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry Blood 113 4179-4187
[8]  
Bloomfield CD(2004)Karyotype is an independent prognostic parameter in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML): an analysis of 93 patients with t-AML in comparison to 1091 patients with de novo AML Leukemia 18 120-125
[9]  
Schoch C(2018)CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) liposome for injection versus conventional cytarabine plus daunorubicin in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia J Clin Oncol 36 2684-2692
[10]  
Kern W(2014)Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older adults J Clin Oncol 32 2541-2552