Application of Water Poverty Index (WPI) in Nepalese Context: A Case Study of Kali Gandaki River Basin (KGRB)

被引:0
作者
Sujata Manandhar
Vishnu Prasad Pandey
Futaba Kazama
机构
[1] University of Yamanashi,International Special Doctoral Course for Integrated River Basin Management, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering
[2] University of Yamanashi,International Research Center for River Basin Environment (ICRE)
来源
Water Resources Management | 2012年 / 26卷
关键词
Kali Gandaki River Basin; Nepal; Water Poverty Index; Water resources management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article details an application of Water Poverty Index (WPI) to evaluate state of water resources in the context of Nepalese river basins with a case study of Kali Gandaki River Basin (KGRB) located in western Nepal. Considering that water poverty issues and indicators to represent them are location-specific, selecting suitable indicators with due care of local context and data availability is essential to apply the WPI, a holistic tool for water resources planning and management. In this study, it suggests and describes a set of ten WPI indicators and twelve variables suitable in the Nepalese context. The selected set of indicators and variables is used to discuss water poverty situation in the study basin as a whole, spatial variation within the basin and variation at different spatial scales in the basin, that is, basin, sub-unit of the basin (district) and sub-unit of the district (Village Development Committee (VDC)). The study result shows that WPI varies widely (from 37.1 to 56.5) within the study basin suggesting the need of location-specific policy interventions. At different spatial scales, there is no clear trend; however, analysis of the WPI components shows higher resources and access at basin level; higher use, environment and capacity at sub-sub-unit of the basin level. Such variations suggest the need of scale-specific policy interventions and management plans to improve overall water poverty situation in the study basin. Overall, the WPI helped to examine the water poverty situation and recommend priority areas of policy interventions for the improvement of water-poverty situation in the basin.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 107
页数:18
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Abrams L(1999)The African Water Page: an experiment in knowledge transfer Water Int 24 140-146
[2]  
Alessa L(2008)The arctic water resource vulnerability index: an integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater Environ Manag 42 523-541
[3]  
Kliskey A(2010)Water needs assessment: learning to deal with scale, subjectivity and high stakes J Hydrol 388 251-257
[4]  
Lammers R(1999)Management of Water Scarcity: a focus on social capacities and options Phys Chem Earth (B) 24 361-373
[5]  
Arp C(2008)Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach Sustain Dev 16 251-260
[6]  
White D(2008)Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests Science 320 1444-1449
[7]  
Hinzman L(2005)The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation Glob Environ Chang 15 151-163
[8]  
Busey R(2006)Urbanization affects stream ecosystem function by altering hydrology, chemistry, and biotic richness Ecol Appl 16 1796-1807
[9]  
Alexander KS(2004)Targeting the water-poor through water poverty mapping Water Policy 6 397-411
[10]  
Moglia M(2000)Review: domestic hygiene and diarrhea—pinpointing the problem Trop Med Int Health 5 22-32