Evaluation of residential building damage for the July 2021 flood in Westport, New Zealand

被引:0
作者
Ryan Paulik
Alec Wild
Conrad Zorn
Liam Wotherspoon
Shaun Williams
机构
[1] University of Auckland,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering
[2] National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA),undefined
[3] Greta Point,undefined
[4] Aon,undefined
[5] National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research,undefined
来源
Geoscience Letters | / 11卷
关键词
Flood; Damage; Residential building; Univariable model; Multivariable model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reliable flood damage models are informed by detailed damage assessments. Damage models are critical in flood risk assessments, representing an elements vulnerability to damage. This study evaluated residential building damage for the July 2021 flood in Westport, New Zealand. We report on flood hazard, exposure and damage features observed for 247 residential buildings. Damage samples were applied to evaluate univariable and multivariable model performance using different variable sample sizes and regression-based supervised learning algorithms. Feature analysis for damage prediction showed high importance of water depth variables and low importance for commonly observed building variables such as structural frame and storeys. Overfitting occurred for most models evaluated when more than 150 samples were used. This resulted from limited damage heterogeneity observed, and variables of low importance affecting model learning. The Random Forest algorithm, which considered multiple important variables (water depth above floor level, area and floor height) improved predictive precision by 17% relative to other models when over 150 damage samples were considered. Our findings suggest the evaluated model performance could be improved by incorporating heterogeneous damage samples from similar flood contexts, in turn increasing capacity for reliable spatial transfer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Aerts JC(2018)A review of cost estimates for flood adaptation Water 45 5-32
[2]  
Apel H(2009)Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? Nat Hazards 24 513-528
[3]  
Aronica GT(2020)Empirical flash flood vulnerability functions for residential buildings SN Applied Sci 14 1137-1145
[4]  
Kreibich H(2001)Random forests Mach Learn 2 18-22
[5]  
Thieken AH(2023)Leveraging data driven approaches for enhanced tsunami damage modelling: Insights from the 2011 Great East Japan event Environ Model Soft 12 2825-2830
[6]  
Arrighi C(1998)Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences Atmos Environ 8 579-588
[7]  
Mazzanti B(2016)A review of flood loss models as basis for harmonization and benchmarking PLoS ONE undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Pistone F(2007)Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation J Am Stat Assoc undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Castelli F(2014)A new variable importance measure for random forests with missing data Stat Comput undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Breiman L(1995)A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection Ijcai undefined undefined-undefined