Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis

被引：0

作者：

Areti Angeliki Veroniki

Sofia Tsokani

Stella Zevgiti

Irene Pagkalidou

Katerina-Maria Kontouli

Pinar Ambarcioglu

Nikos Pandis

Carole Lunny

Adriani Nikolakopoulou

Theodoros Papakonstantinou

Anna Chaimani

Sharon E. Straus

Brian Hutton

Andrea C. Tricco

Dimitris Mavridis

Georgia Salanti

机构：

[1] University of Ioannina,Department of Primary Education, School of Education

[2] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,Knowledge Translation Program

[3] St. Michael’s Hospital,Department of Hygiene, Social

[4] Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, Medical School

[5] Mustafa Kemal University,Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

[6] University of Bern,Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental School/Medical Faculty

[7] University of British Columbia,Cochrane Hypertension Review Group and the Therapeutics Initiative

[8] University of Freiburg,Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center

[9] University of Bern,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine

[10] Université de Paris,Department of Geriatric Medicine

[11] Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS UMR1153),Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health

[12] INSERM,undefined

[13] INRA,undefined

[14] Cochrane France,undefined

[15] University of Toronto,undefined

[16] Ottawa Hospital Research Institute,undefined

[17] University of Ottawa School of Epidemiology and Public Health,undefined

[18] University of Toronto,undefined

[19] Paris Descartes University,undefined

[20] Sorbonne Paris CitéFaculté de Médecine,undefined

来源：

Systematic Reviews | / 10卷

关键词：

Multiple treatment meta-analysis; PRISMA-NMA; Systematic review; Reporting;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

共 6 条

[1] Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Tsokani, Sofia
Zevgiti, Stella
Pagkalidou, Irene
Kontouli, Katerina-Maria
Ambarcioglu, Pinar
Pandis, Nikos
Lunny, Carole
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Papakonstantinou, Theodoros
Chaimani, Anna
Straus, Sharon E.
Hutton, Brian
Tricco, Andrea C.
Mavridis, Dimitris
Salanti, Georgia
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
[2] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
David Moher
Larissa Shamseer
Mike Clarke
Davina Ghersi
Alessandro Liberati
Mark Petticrew
Paul Shekelle
Lesley A Stewart
Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
[3] Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
Katarina Maticic
Marina Krnic Martinic
Livia Puljak
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
[4] Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
Maticic, Katarina
Martinic, Marina Krnic
Puljak, Livia
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
[5] Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology
Park, Ho Young
Suh, Chong Hyun
Woo, Sungmin
Kim, Pyeong Hwa
Kim, Kyung Won
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (03) : 355 - 369
[6] A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bigna J.J.R.
Um L.N.
Nansseu J.R.N.
Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)

← 1 →