Maternal health-related quality of life after induction of labor or expectant monitoring in pregnancy complicated by intrauterine growth retardation beyond 36 weeks

[1] Balcazar H(1994)Use of anthropometric indicators and maternal risk factors to evaluate intrauterine growth retardation in infants weighing more than 2500 grams at birth Early Human Development 36 147-155

[2] Keefer L(1994)Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: Comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 101 422-427

[3] Chard T(1996)Perinatal outcome of idiopathic small for gestational age pregnancies at term: The effect of antenatal diagnosis International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 55 29-32

[4] Chang TC(1987)Apgar score, meconium and acidaemia at birth in small-for-gestational age infants born at term, and their relation to neonatal neurological morbidity British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 94 873-879

[5] Robson SC(2001)Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185 652-659

[6] Spencer JA(1990)The differential neonatal morbidity of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 163 151-157

[7] Gallivan S(2006)Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): A pilot study European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction biology 125 54-58

[8] Ohel G(2007)Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term: DIGITAT BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 7 12-483

[9] Ruach M(2010)Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT) BMJ 341 c7087-1068

[10] Dijxhoorn MJ(1992)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Medical Care 30 473-663

[1] Balcazar H(1994)Use of anthropometric indicators and maternal risk factors to evaluate intrauterine growth retardation in infants weighing more than 2500 grams at birth Early Human Development 36 147-155

[2] Keefer L(1994)Prediction of perinatal morbidity at term in small fetuses: Comparison of fetal growth and Doppler ultrasound British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 101 422-427

[3] Chard T(1996)Perinatal outcome of idiopathic small for gestational age pregnancies at term: The effect of antenatal diagnosis International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 55 29-32

[4] Chang TC(1987)Apgar score, meconium and acidaemia at birth in small-for-gestational age infants born at term, and their relation to neonatal neurological morbidity British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 94 873-879

[5] Robson SC(2001)Perinatal correlates and neonatal outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at term gestation American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185 652-659

[6] Spencer JA(1990)The differential neonatal morbidity of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 163 151-157

[7] Gallivan S(2006)Intrauterine growth restriction at term: Induction or spontaneous labour? Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term (DIGITAT): A pilot study European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproduction biology 125 54-58

[8] Ohel G(2007)Disproportionate intrauterine growth intervention trial at term: DIGITAT BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 7 12-483

[9] Ruach M(2010)Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT) BMJ 341 c7087-1068

[10] Dijxhoorn MJ(1992)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Medical Care 30 473-663