Audit of Caesarean Section Births in Small Private Maternity Homes: Analysis of 15-Year Data Applying the Modified Robson Criteria, Canada

被引:5
作者
Atnurkar K.B. [1 ]
Mahale A.R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dass Clinic, Tilaknagar, Nanded, Maharashtra
[2] Mahale Hospital, Borban, Nanded, Maharashtra
关键词
Caesarean section; Small private maternity hospitals; TGCS (Canada);
D O I
10.1007/s13224-016-0894-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To audit the data of caesarean sections carried out in single-handed-run small private hospitals on the basis of the modified Robson criteria (Canada), to know the changing trends of caesarean sections over a considerable duration of time (15 years) in private sector, and to focus on a particular group out of the classification of caesarean section in the efforts to reduce the caesarean section rate. Methods: It is a retrospective observational study of 7342 caesarean section cases carried out in different small private maternity hospitals over a period of 15 years. The data analysed by applying the modified Robson criteria (Canada) and the changing trends were studied in the view of reducing caesarean section rate. Results: Statistically significant increasing trend was observed in groups of both primary and repeat caesarean section cases done before the onset of labour in the last 5 years. Conclusion: Auditing the data of caesarean sections on the basis of the modified Robson criteria (Canada) is a better way of classification as compared to Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). The change in trends is seen only in the last 5 years, which suggests that there is shift in attitude of the obstetricians of small private hospitals in performing caesarean sections before onset of labour than performing it after the onset of labour. Our analysis suggests the obstetricians from small private hospitals to target groups 2B, 4B and 5C. © 2016, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Das S., Char D., Sarkar S., Et al., Changing trends in caesarean section: rate and indications, J Dental Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS), 13, 1, pp. 7-9, (2014)
[2]  
Torloni M.R., Betran A.P., Souza J.P., Et al., Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review, PLoS ONE, 6, 1, (2011)
[3]  
Prasad M., Good time to adopt ten-group Robson classification to report LSCS rates in india? Letter to the Editor, J Obstet Gynecol India, 65, 4, pp. 286-287, (2015)
[4]  
Scarella A., Chamy V., Sepulveda M., Et al., Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the caesarean section rate, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 154, 2, pp. 136-140, (2011)
[5]  
Kelly S., Sprague A., Fell D.B., Et al., Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 35, 3, pp. 206-214, (2013)
[6]  
Farine D., Shephard D., Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the modified Robson criteria, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 34, 10, pp. 976-983, (2012)
[7]  
Cheryl C., Lin L.S., Arijit B., Changing trends of caesarean section births by Robson Ten group classification in a tertiary teaching hospital, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, (2012)
[8]  
Barber E.L., Lundsberg L.S., Belanger K., Et al., Indications contributing to the increasing caesarean delivery rate, Obstet Gynecol, 118, 1, pp. 29-38, (2011)
[9]  
Norton M.E., Editorial comment on Safe prevention of the Primary Ceasarean Delivery, Obstet Gynecol Survey, 69, 7, pp. 381-383, (2014)