Evaluation of ecosystem services of Chinese pine forests in China

被引:0
作者
Hao Guo
Bing Wang
XiangQian Ma
GuangDong Zhao
ShaoNing Li
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Forest Ecological Environment of State Forestry Administration,Research Institute of Forest Ecology Environment and Protection of CAF
来源
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences | 2008年 / 51卷
关键词
ecosystem services; physical quantity; value; evaluation; Chinese pine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation of forest ecosystem services is a hot topic, both in China and at abroad, but it has not yet obtained a consistency of evaluation indicator systems and evaluation methods. Under the framework of evaluation criteria to be implemented for forest ecosystem services, years of consecutive observation data from Long Term Ecological Research Stations affiliated to Chinese Forest Ecosystem Research Network (CFERN), forest resource inventory and public data were applied to carry out a detailed and dynamic evaluation on the physical quantity and value of ecosystem services of Chinese pine forests in China. The results showed that the above services had the total value and unit value of 1144.9640 billion (1.1449640×1012) RMB and 52.074 thousand RMB per hectare per year, respectively during the 9th Five-year Plan (1996–2000), and of 1190.5461 billion RMB and 52.101 thousand RMB per hectare per year, respectively, during the 10th Five-year Plan (2001–2005). For Chinese pine forests, water conservation was 40.40 hundred million cubic meters annually, soil conservation was 67 million tons and C fixation 9 million tons annually, production of healthful negative ions was 1.96×1020, absorption of SO2 was 5.02 hundred million kilograms and dust-catching was 759.10 hundred million kilograms. Among the 15 provinces of China with Chinese pine forests, the biggest beneficiary from ecosystem services was Liaoning Province; while Hunan Province was the smallest beneficiary between the 9th Five-year Plan.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 670
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A background of forests functions as a part of ecosystem services systems [J].
Schneider, Jiri ;
Vyskot, Ilja ;
Lorencova, Helena ;
Lampartova, Ivana .
PROCEEDINGS FROM IX. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED BUSINESS RESEARCH (ICABR 2014), 2015, :1015-1023
[22]   Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests [J].
Hayha, Tiina ;
Franzese, Pier Paolo ;
Paletto, Alessandro ;
Fath, Brian D. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 14 :12-23
[23]   Resident Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services in Hillside Forests [J].
Chen, Wan-Jiun ;
Jan, Jihn-Fa ;
Chung, Chih-Hsin ;
Liaw, Shyue-Cherng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
[24]   Spatial complementarity of forests and farms: Accounting for ecosystem services [J].
Pattanayak, SK ;
Butry, DT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (04) :995-1008
[25]   Pricing ecosystem resilience in frequent-fire ponderosa pine forests [J].
Wu, Tong ;
Kim, Yeon-Su .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 27 :8-12
[26]   Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Radiation Assessment of the National Ecological Sheltering Zone in China [J].
Su, Kai ;
Jiang, Xuebing .
FORESTS, 2023, 14 (02)
[27]   Determining the payment for ecosystem services of mangrove forests: The approach combining ecosystem services and social-economic level and application in Shankou National Nature Reserve, Guangxi, China [J].
Zhang, Yunlan ;
Pan, Lianghao ;
Liu, Yu ;
Tao, Yancheng ;
Su, Zhinan ;
Huang, Qi ;
Wei, Jiangling ;
Wu, Erjiang ;
Fan, Hangqing ;
Qiu, Guanglong .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 54
[28]   Landscape management and economic evaluation of the ecosystem services of the vineyards [J].
Sgroi, Filippo .
AIMS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (04) :393-402
[29]   The evaluation of Ecosystem Services production: an application in the Province of Ferrara [J].
Chatzinikolaou, Parthena ;
Viaggi, Davide ;
Raggi, Meri .
BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 4 (03) :235-259
[30]   Profit efficiency in the provision of ecosystem services in the Cross Timbers forests [J].
Susaeta, Andres ;
Sancewich, Brian ;
Klizentyte, Kotryna ;
Soto, Jose ;
Joshi, Omkar .
LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 136