Financialization and the Employee Suicide Crisis at France Telecom

被引:0
作者
Nihel Chabrak
Russell Craig
Nabyla Daidj
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates University,Accounting Department, College of Business & Economics
[2] Victoria University,College of Business
[3] Institut Mines Télécom,Department of Management Marketing and Strategy, Télécom Business School
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2016年 / 139卷
关键词
Employee; Financialization; Solidarity; Suicide; Workplace; Anomie; Social partnership;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The privatization of France Telecom (FT) in 1997 led to the implementation of a profit-oriented financialization strategy. An unforgiving work environment was developed, which has unsettled many employees. Between February 2008 and October 2011, 69 employees took their own life. Many left notes blaming management for having privileged the interests of shareholders over those of employees. Through interviews with employees and professional practitioners associated with FT, we reveal that employees strongly resented the company’s use of financialization policies to maximize shareholder value. Pursuit of such policies led to the de-institutionalization of socially prescribed norms that were applied commonly in Continental European workplaces. Feelings of anomie, disgrace, futility and isolation ensued among employees. This case highlights an important effect of a modern corporation’s adoption of financialization policies. It points to the need to improve workplace sensitivities and the ethical dispositions of companies and their managers.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 515
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Antonakakis N(2014)The impact of fiscal austerity on suicide: On the empirics of a modern Greek tragedy Social Science & Medicine 112 39-50
[2]  
Collins A(1999)A team production theory of corporate law Virginia Law Review 85 247-328
[3]  
Blair M(2014)The shareholder value mythology and the market “Communion” Law and Financial Markets Review 8 27-38
[4]  
Stout L(2013)Financialization in the workplace: Hegemonic narratives, performative interventions and the angry knowledge worker Accounting, Organizations and Society 38 314-331
[5]  
Chabrak N(2003)Anomie and strain: Context and consequences of Merton’s two theories Sociological Inquiry 73 471-489
[6]  
Cushen J(1969)The reform of collective bargaining from Donovan to Durkheim British Journal of Industrial Relations 7 151-180
[7]  
Featherstone R(2000)Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves Economy and Society 29 80-110
[8]  
Deflem M(2000)Restructuring for shareholder value and its implications for labour Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 771-798
[9]  
Fox A(2001)After Durkheim: An agenda for the sociology of business ethics Journal of Business Ethics 34 209-218
[10]  
Flanders A(2006)Workplace bullying, psychological perspectives and industrial relations: Towards a contextualized and interdisciplinary approach British Journal of Industrial Relations 44 239-262