Prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: where are we now?

被引:0
作者
Matti Aapro
Jeffrey Crawford
Didier Kamioner
机构
[1] IMO Clinique de Genolier,Department of Medicine
[2] Duke University Medical Centre,undefined
[3] Hôpital Privé de l’Ouest Parisien,undefined
来源
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2010年 / 18卷
关键词
Cancer treatment; Colony-stimulating factors; Neutropenia; Guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Updated international guidelines published in 2006 have broadened the scope for the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in supporting delivery of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. G-CSF prophylaxis is now recommended when the overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) due to regimen and individual patient factors is ≥20%, for supporting dose-dense and dose-intense chemotherapy and to help maintain dose density where dose reductions have been shown to compromise outcomes. Indeed, there is now a large body of evidence for the efficacy of G-CSFs in supporting dose-dense chemotherapy. Predictive tools that can help target those patients who are most at risk of FN are now becoming available. Recent analyses have shown that, by reducing the risk of FN and chemotherapy dose delays and reductions, G-CSF prophylaxis can potentially enhance survival benefits in patients receiving chemotherapy in curative settings. Accumulating data from ‘real-world’ clinical practice settings indicate that patients often receive abbreviated courses of daily G-CSF and consequently obtain a reduced level of FN protection. A single dose of PEGylated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) may provide a more effective, as well as a more convenient, alternative to daily G-CSF. Prospective studies are needed to validate the importance of delivering the full dose intensity of standard chemotherapy regimens, with G-CSF support where appropriate, across a range of settings. These studies should also incorporate prospective evaluation of risk stratification for neutropenia and its complications.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 541
页数:12
相关论文
共 873 条
[41]  
Link BK(2008)Prognostic factors for hematotoxicity of chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Ann Oncol 19 752-7071
[42]  
Budd GT(2009)Multivariate analysis of febrile neutropenia occurrence in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: data from the INC-EU Prospective Observational European Neutropenia Study Br J Haematol 144 677-1733
[43]  
Scott S(2005)Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia Oncologist 10 427-1439
[44]  
Dickman E(2008)Final risk prediction model for neutropenic complications in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy Blood 112 Abstract 1312-641
[45]  
Paul D(2007)A validated risk model for early neutropenic events in older cancer patients receiving systemic chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 25 Abstract 9036-633
[46]  
Lawless G(1988)A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth Cancer Res 48 7067-404
[47]  
Lee MW(1979)A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate Cancer Treat Rep 63 1727-116
[48]  
Fridman M(2003)Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741 J Clin Oncol 21 1431-2766
[49]  
Ford J(2004)Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL Blood 104 634-502
[50]  
Carter WB(2004)Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL Blood 104 626-884