Influence of teleost abundance on the distribution and abundance of sharks in Florida Bay, USA

被引:0
作者
Leigh G. Torres
Michael R. Heithaus
Bryan Delius
机构
[1] Duke University Marine Laboratory,Marine Biology Program Department of Biological Sciences
[2] Florida International University,undefined
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2006年 / 569卷
关键词
sharks; habitat use; spatial scale; predator–prey interactions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the factors that influence the distribution and abundance of predators, including sharks, is important for predicting the impacts of human changes to the environment. Such studies are particularly important in Florida Bay, USA where there are planned large-scale changes to patterns of freshwater input from the Everglades ecosystem. Studies of many marine predators suggest that links between predator and prey habitat use may vary with spatial scale, but there have been few studies of the role of prey distribution in shaping habitat use and abundance of sharks. We used longline catches of sharks and trawls for potential teleost prey to determine the influence of teleost abundance on shark abundance at the scale of regions and habitats in Florida Bay. We found that shark catch per unit effort (CPUE) was not linked to CPUE ofteleosts at the scale of sampling sites, but shark CPUE was positively correlated with the mean CPUE for teleosts within a region. Although there does not appear to be a strong match between the abundance of teleosts and sharks at small spatial scales, regional shark abundance is likely driven, at least partially, by the availability of prey. Management strategies that influence teleost abundance will have cascading effects to higher trophic levels in Florida Bay.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 455
页数:6
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Butler M. J.(1995)Cascading disturbances in Florida Bay, USA: cyanobacteria blooms, sponge mortality, and implications for juvenile spiny lobster Panulirus argus Marine Ecology Progress Series 129 119-125
  • [2] Hunt J. H.(2000)Scale-dependent predator–prey interactions: the hierarchical spatial distribution of seabirds and prey Ecology 81 773-783
  • [3] Herrnkind W. F.(1970)On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds Acta Biotheoretica 19 16-36
  • [4] Childress M. J.(2001)Spatial distribution of foraging in female Antarctic fur seals Arctocephalus gazella in relation to oceanographic variables: a scale-dependent approach using geographic information systems Marine Ecology Progress Series 219 251-264
  • [5] Bertelsen R.(2001)The biology of tiger sharks, Environmental Biology of Fishes 61 25-36
  • [6] Sharp W.(2002), in Shark Bay, Western Australia: sex ratio, size distribution, diet, and seasonal changes in catch rates Marine Biology 140 237-248
  • [7] Matthews T.(2005)Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks ( Marine Biology 147 27-35
  • [8] Field J. M.(2002) in a seagrass ecosystem Marine and Freshwater Research 53 543-550
  • [9] Marshall G.(1994)Habitat use and group size of pied cormorants ( Journal of Fish Biology 45 151-169
  • [10] Fauchald P. K.(1999)) in a seagrass ecosystem: possible effects of food abundance and predation risk Estuaries 22 534-551