A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Antonio Rangel
Colin Camerer
P. Read Montague
机构
[1] California Institute of Technology,Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) and Computational and Neural Systems Program
[2] Computational Psychiatry Unit,Department of Neuroscience
[3] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2008年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most behavioural and computational models of decision making assume that the following five processes are carried out at the time the decision is made: representation, action valuation, action selection, outcome valuation, and learning.On the basis of a sizeable body of animal and human behavioural evidence, several groups have proposed the existence of three different types of valuation systems: Pavlovian, habitual and goal-directed systems.Pavlovian systems assign value to only a small set of 'prepared' behaviours and thus have a limited behavioural repertoire. Nevertheless, they might be the driving force behind behaviours with important economic consequences (for example, overeating). Examples include preparatory behaviours, such as approaching a cue that predicts food, and consummatory behaviours, such as ingesting available food.Habit valuation systems learn to assign values to stimulus–response associations on the basis of previous experience through a process of trial-and-error. Examples of habits include a smoker's desire to have a cigarette at particular times of day (for example, after a meal) and a rat's tendency to forage in a cue-dependent location after sufficient training.Goal-directed systems assign values to actions by computing action–outcome associations and then evaluating the rewards that are associated with the different outcomes. An example of a goal-directed behaviour is the decision what to eat at a new restaurant.An important difference between habitual and goal-directed systems has to do with how they respond to changes in the environment. The goal-directed system updates the value of an action as soon as the value of its outcome changes, whereas the habit system only learns with repeated experience.The values computed by the three systems can be modulated by factors such as the risk that is associated with the decision, the time delay to the outcomes, and social considerations.The quality of the decisions made by an animal depend on how its brain assigns control to the different valuation systems in situations in which it has to make a choice between several potential actions that are assigned conflicting values.The learning properties of the habit system seem to be well-described by simple reinforcement algorithms, such as Q-learning. Some of the key computations that are predicted by these models are instantiated in the dopamine system.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 556
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The suggestible brain: posthypnotic effects on value-based decision-making
    Ludwig, Vera U.
    Steze, Christine
    Krutiak, Harald
    Magrabi, Amadeus
    Steimke, Rosa
    Paschke, Lena M.
    Kathmann, Norbert
    Walter, Henrik
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (09) : 1281 - 1288
  • [32] Value-Based Decision Making in Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis
    Mukherjee, Dahlia
    Kable, Joseph W.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 2 (06) : 767 - 782
  • [33] Reward Learning and Value-Based Decision-Making in Suicidal Behavior
    Dombrovski, Alexandre Y.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (09) : 10S - 11S
  • [34] The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making
    Hikosaka, Okihide
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 11 (07) : 503 - 513
  • [35] Recovery From Addiction: Behavioral Economics and Value-Based Decision Making
    Field, Matt
    Heather, Nick
    Murphy, James G.
    Stafford, Tom
    Tucker, Jalie A.
    Witkiewitz, Katie
    PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2020, 34 (01) : 182 - 193
  • [36] To stay or not to stay: The stability of choice perseveration in value-based decision making
    Senftleben, Ulrike
    Schoemann, Martin
    Rudolf, Matthias
    Scherbaum, Stefan
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 74 (01): : 199 - 217
  • [37] Adult age differences in value-based decision making Sebastian Horn
    Horn, Sebastian
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 55
  • [38] Multiple Facets of Value-Based Decision Making in Major Depressive Disorder
    Mukherjee, Dahlia
    Lee, Sangil
    Kazinka, Rebecca
    Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
    Kable, Joseph W.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01) : 3415
  • [39] The Neural Representation of Unexpected Uncertainty during Value-Based Decision Making
    Payzan-LeNestour, Elise
    Dunne, Simon
    Bossaerts, Peter
    O'Doherty, John P.
    NEURON, 2013, 79 (01) : 191 - 201
  • [40] The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making
    Okihide Hikosaka
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2010, 11 : 503 - 513