A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Antonio Rangel
Colin Camerer
P. Read Montague
机构
[1] California Institute of Technology,Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) and Computational and Neural Systems Program
[2] Computational Psychiatry Unit,Department of Neuroscience
[3] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2008年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most behavioural and computational models of decision making assume that the following five processes are carried out at the time the decision is made: representation, action valuation, action selection, outcome valuation, and learning.On the basis of a sizeable body of animal and human behavioural evidence, several groups have proposed the existence of three different types of valuation systems: Pavlovian, habitual and goal-directed systems.Pavlovian systems assign value to only a small set of 'prepared' behaviours and thus have a limited behavioural repertoire. Nevertheless, they might be the driving force behind behaviours with important economic consequences (for example, overeating). Examples include preparatory behaviours, such as approaching a cue that predicts food, and consummatory behaviours, such as ingesting available food.Habit valuation systems learn to assign values to stimulus–response associations on the basis of previous experience through a process of trial-and-error. Examples of habits include a smoker's desire to have a cigarette at particular times of day (for example, after a meal) and a rat's tendency to forage in a cue-dependent location after sufficient training.Goal-directed systems assign values to actions by computing action–outcome associations and then evaluating the rewards that are associated with the different outcomes. An example of a goal-directed behaviour is the decision what to eat at a new restaurant.An important difference between habitual and goal-directed systems has to do with how they respond to changes in the environment. The goal-directed system updates the value of an action as soon as the value of its outcome changes, whereas the habit system only learns with repeated experience.The values computed by the three systems can be modulated by factors such as the risk that is associated with the decision, the time delay to the outcomes, and social considerations.The quality of the decisions made by an animal depend on how its brain assigns control to the different valuation systems in situations in which it has to make a choice between several potential actions that are assigned conflicting values.The learning properties of the habit system seem to be well-described by simple reinforcement algorithms, such as Q-learning. Some of the key computations that are predicted by these models are instantiated in the dopamine system.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 556
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recommendations to drive a value-based decision-making on vaccination
    de Waure, Chiara
    Calabro, Giovanna Elisa
    Ricciardi, Walter
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (03) : 289 - 296
  • [22] The Relationship between Personality and Value-Based Decision-Making
    Mendes, Fabiana Freitas
    PROCEEDINGS 2018 IEEE/ACM 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING - COMPANION (ICSE-COMPANION, 2018, : 460 - 461
  • [23] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, VALUE-BASED DECISION MAKING, AND INNOVATION
    Henshall, Chris
    Schuller, Tara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 29 (04) : 353 - 359
  • [24] Value-Based Decision Making: Decision Theory Meets e-Government
    Sundberg, Leif
    Gidlund, Katarina L.
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT (EGOV 2017), 2017, 10428 : 351 - 358
  • [25] Editorial overview: Value-based decision making: control, value, and context in action
    Bradfield, Laura
    Balleine, Bernard
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2021, 41
  • [26] Opioid Modulation of Value-Based Decision-Making in Healthy Humans
    Marie Eikemo
    Guido Biele
    Frode Willoch
    Lotte Thomsen
    Siri Leknes
    Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017, 42 : 1833 - 1840
  • [27] VALUE-BASED DETERMINANTS OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN BREAST CANCER DECISION MAKING
    Pierce, Penny F.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (09) : 2055 - 2055
  • [28] Value-Based Model: A new perspective in Medical Decision-making
    Riva, Silvia
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 4
  • [29] Memory guidance of value-based decision making at an abstract level of representation
    Liashenko, Anna
    Dizaji, Aslan S.
    Melloni, Lucia
    Schwiedrzik, Caspar M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [30] The lateral prefrontal cortex and complex value-based learning and decision making
    Dixon, Matthew L.
    Christoff, Kalina
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 45 : 9 - 18