Donor insemination

被引:0
|
作者
Katzorke T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Novum - Zentrum für Fortpflanzungsmedizin und Endokrinologie, Essen
[2] Novum - Zentrum für Fortpflanzungsmedizin und Endokrinologie, Essen, 45127 Essen
来源
Der Gynäkologe | 2007年 / 40卷 / 10期
关键词
Anonymity; Counseling; Donor insemination; Donor offspring; German legislation;
D O I
10.1007/s00129-007-2049-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial insemination by semen from a donor may be performed in cases of male infertility or failure of modern methods of ART (ICSI) as well as to prevent the risk of genetic diseases. As a result of this therapy, which is regulated by public law § 1600 BGB, approximately 1,000 children are born in Germany every year. For the first time the German Medical Association has recently released a proposal on guidelines for the use of donor semen. However, important topics, such as the child's right of knowledge of its genetic origin still remain to be regulated in more detail. Of the parents 80% do not want to inform the child about its genetic origin and wish a treatment in secrecy. Conflicting points in the present practice (e.g. recruitment of donors, documentation, secrecy or openness) should be regulated in the future. Artificial insemination by donor has gained validity as a scientifically based treatment in the field of reproductive medicine. © 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 812
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PSYCHOSOCIAL-ASPECTS OF DONOR INSEMINATION - ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS OF DANISH AND SWEDISH DONOR INSEMINATION PATIENTS TO PSYCHOSOCIAL INFORMATION BEING SUPPLIED TO OFFSPRING AND RELATIVES
    NIELSEN, AF
    PEDERSEN, B
    LAURITSEN, JG
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 74 (01) : 45 - 50
  • [32] Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation
    Matorras, R
    Gorostiaga, A
    Diez, J
    Corcostegui, B
    Pijoan, JI
    Ramon, O
    RodriguezEscudero, FJ
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (03) : 620 - 625
  • [33] Single versus double insemination: a retrospective audit of pregnancy rates with two treatment protocols in donor insemination
    Deary, AJ
    Seaton, JEV
    Prentice, A
    Morton, NC
    Booth, AK
    Smith, SK
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) : 1494 - 1496
  • [34] PCOS in lesbian and heterosexual women treated with artificial donor insemination
    De Sutter, P.
    Dutre, T.
    Meerschaut, F. Vanden
    Stuyver, I.
    Van Maele, G.
    Dhont, M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (03) : 398 - 402
  • [35] Donor insemination disclosure in social networks: heterosexual couples' experiences
    Kerckhof, Mauro
    Van Parys, Hanna
    Pennings, Guido
    De Sutter, Petra
    Buysse, Ann
    Provoost, Veerle
    CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2020, 22 (03) : 292 - 306
  • [36] Donor insemination: Dutch parents' opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children
    Brewaeys, A
    Golombok, S
    Naaktgeboren, N
    deBruyn, JK
    vanHall, EV
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) : 1591 - 1597
  • [37] Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor insemination
    Paul, Marilyn S.
    Berger, Roni
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (09) : 2566 - 2571
  • [38] Donor insemination and infertility: what general urologists need to know
    Han, Justin S.
    Brannigan, Robert E.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2008, 5 (03): : 151 - 158
  • [39] Stimulated intrauterine insemination (SIUI) and donor insemination (DI) as first line management for a selected subfertile population: the Manchester experience
    Vitthala, S.
    Gelbaya, T. A.
    Hunter, H.
    Roberts, S. A.
    Nardo, L. G.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2008, 25 (9-10) : 431 - 436
  • [40] Stimulated intrauterine insemination (SIUI) and donor insemination (DI) as first line management for a selected subfertile population: the Manchester experience
    S. Vitthala
    T. A. Gelbaya
    H. Hunter
    S. A. Roberts
    L. G. Nardo
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2008, 25 : 431 - 436