Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage

被引:0
作者
David A. Sprenger
Adrian Schwaninger
机构
[1] University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland,School of Applied Psychology
来源
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | / 18卷
关键词
E-learning; Digital learning technologies; Technology acceptance; Perceived ease of use; Perceived usefulness; Behavioral intention; Classroom response system; Classroom chat; E-lectures; Mobile virtual reality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Digital technologies have gained much popularity in education thanks to the cost efficiency they gain through scalability. While the acceptance of some of these new digital technologies has been investigated, there are few direct comparisons. The most established model for measuring acceptance is the technology acceptance model, which can predict the behavioral intention to use the technology. We compared four digital learning technologies (e-lectures, classroom response system, classroom chat, and mobile virtual reality) in terms of their technology acceptance. The classroom response system had the highest level of acceptance. It was closely followed by e-lectures, then the classroom chat and then mobile virtual reality. The students evaluated all tools favorably before and after usage, except for mobile virtual reality, which saw a substantial drop in perceived usefulness and behavioral intention after 3 months’ usage.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Aagard H(2010)Hotseat: Opening the backchannel in large lectures Educause Quarterly 33 2-256
[2]  
Bowen K(2016)Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors Computers in Human Behavior 56 238-17
[3]  
Olesova L(2019)Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis of social media use and education International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16 32-240
[4]  
Abdullah F(2003)Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations 2 13-20
[5]  
Ward R(2018)Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results Medical Education Online 23 1555434-121
[6]  
Abrahim S(2005)Analyzing the reliability of multidimensional measures: An example from intelligence research Educational and Psychological Measurement 65 227-175
[7]  
Mir BA(2009)An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73 21-336
[8]  
Suhara H(2007)Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips CBE Life Science Education 6 9-60
[9]  
Mohamed FA(2016)Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis Computers & Education 96 109-340
[10]  
Sato M(2013)Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning Computers & Education 63 160-46