Collaborative sampling trial in the context of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring programme for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea

被引:0
作者
Michael Gluschke
机构
[1] Dottikon Exclusive Synthesis AG,
来源
Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2008年 / 13卷
关键词
Sampling; Harmonization; Collaborative sampling trial; Baltic Sea; Quality assurance; Marine monitoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents the assessment of a collaborative trial in sampling in the Baltic Sea in the framework of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring programme for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. The objective of investigations was to determine the influence of sampling on analytical results for selected monitoring parameters and to harmonize the procedure for sampling of sea water to a large extent. In these studies the staff of three vessels took replicate sea water samples, 1 m below the surface and below the halocline, at two monitoring stations. Mass concentration mean values for different nutrient parameters were obtained from each sample, all in one laboratory. Data produced from the hierarchical design were treated with robust analysis of variance (ANOVA) to generate uncertainty estimates, as standard uncertainties (“u” expressed as standard deviation), for geochemical variation (sgeochem), primary sampling (ssampling), and chemical analysis (sanalysis). Geochemical variation dominated the total variance in all cases. Sampling and analytical uncertainties contributed together up to 15% of the total variance and had a relative measurement uncertainty (u%) of less than 2% for all the parameters investigated. Thus for this study the sampling protocol and the analytical method could be regarded as fit-for-purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ramsay MH(1998)Sampling as a source of measurement uncertainty: techniques for quantification and comparison with analytical sources J Anal Atomic Spectrom 13 97-104
[2]  
Ramsey MH(2004)When is sampling part of the measurement process? Accred Qual Assur 9 727-728
[3]  
Lyn JA(2006)The duplicate method of uncertainty estimation: are 8 targets enough? Analyst 132 1147-1152
[4]  
Ramsey MH(1992)Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance J Geochem Explor 44 23-36
[5]  
Coad DS(1997)Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land Sci Total Environ 198 243-257
[6]  
Damant AP(2001)Inter-organisational sampling trials for the uncertainty estimation of landfill gas measurements J Environ Monit 3 288-294
[7]  
Wood R(2002)Optimised uncertainty in food analysis: application and comparison between four contrasting ‘analyte-commodity’ combinations Analyst 127 1252-1260
[8]  
Ramsey M(1989)Robust statistics—how not to reject outliers: Part 1. Basic concepts Analyst 114 1693-1697
[9]  
Thompson M(1989)Robust statistics—how not to reject outliers—Part 2. Interlaboratory trials Analyst 114 1699-1705
[10]  
Hale M(1987)Recommendations for the conduct and interpretation of co-operative trials Analyst 112 679-686