Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Research and the Changing International Collaboration Structure

被引:6
作者
Qin Y. [1 ]
Chen R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Discipline Assessment Center, Office of Strategic Planning, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[2] Network and Information Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
关键词
A; COVID-19; G255.51; high interdisciplinary research; international research collaboration; network analysis; R184;
D O I
10.1007/s12204-022-2558-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Research in Information Science and interdisciplinary areas suggested the formation of a growing network of international research collaboration. The massive transmission of COVID-19 worldwide especially after the identification of the Omicron variant could fundamentally alter the factors shaping the network’s development. This study employs network analysis methods to analyze the structure of the COVID-19 research collaboration from 2020 to 2022, using two major academic publication databases and the VOSviewer software. A novel temporal view is added by examining the dynamic changes of the network, and a fractional counting method is adopted as methodological improvements to previous research. Analysis reveals that the COVID-19 research network structure has undergone substantial changes over time, as collaborating countries and regions form and re-form new clusters. Transformations in the network can be partly explained by key developments in the pandemic and other social-political events. China as one of the largest pivots in the network formed a relatively distinct cluster, with potential to develop a larger Asia-Pacific collaboration cluster based on its research impact. © 2022, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 160
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 — 27 April 2022 [EB/OL].
[2]  
Wang G.H., Zhang Y.T., Zhao J., Et al., Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak [J], Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 40, 3, pp. 279-281, (2020)
[3]  
Nicola M., Alsafi Z., Sohrabi C., Et al., The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review [J], International Journal of Surgery, 78, pp. 185-193, (2020)
[4]  
Pawar M.V., Anuradha J., Pawar A.M., Et al., COVID-19 epidemic impact on various society sectors [M], Healthcare informatics for fighting COVID-19 and future epidemics, pp. 211-232, (2022)
[5]  
Wang X., Huang M., Wang H., Et al., International Collaboration Activity Index: Case study of dye-sensitized solar cells [J], Journal of Informetrics, 8, 4, pp. 854-862, (2014)
[6]  
Boyack K.W., Klavans R., Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? [J], Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 12, pp. 2389-2404, (2010)
[7]  
Wagner C.S., Leydesdorff L., Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international coauthorships from 1990 to 2000 [J], International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1, 2, (2005)
[8]  
Wu L.F., Wang D.S., Evans J.A., Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology [J], Nature, 566, 7744, pp. 378-382, (2019)
[9]  
Adams J., The fourth age of research [J], Nature, 497, 7451, pp. 557-560, (2013)
[10]  
Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B., The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge [J], Science, 316, 5827, pp. 1036-1039, (2007)