Autonomic responses during bladder hydrodistention under general versus spinal anaesthesia in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

被引:0
作者
Yoon Jung Kim
Hyun-Kyu Yoon
Yu Jin Kang
Seung-June Oh
Min Hur
Hee-Pyoung Park
Hyung-Chul Lee
机构
[1] Seoul National University Hospital,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
[2] Pohang St Mary’s Hospital,Department of Urology
[3] Seoul National University Hospital,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine
[4] Ajou University College of Medicine,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Blocking the abrupt increase in systolic blood pressure associated with autonomic response during bladder hydrodistention in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is essential for patient safety. We conducted this study to compare autonomic responses during bladder hydrodistention in patients with IC/BPS under general and spinal anaesthesia. Thirty-six patients were randomly allocated to a general anaesthesia (GA, n = 18) or a spinal anaesthesia (SA, n = 18) group. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured continuously and ΔSBP, defined as maximum increases in SBP during bladder hydrodistention from baseline, was compared between groups. Heart rate variability was analysed using electrocardiograms. The post-anaesthesia care unit assessed postoperative pain using a numeric (0–10) rating scale. Our analyses yield a significantly greater ΔSBP (73.0 [26.0–86.1] vs. 2.0 [− 4.0 to 6.0] mmHg), a significantly lower root-mean-square of successive differences in heart rate variability after bladder hydrodistention (10.8 [7.7–19.8] vs. 20.6 [15.1–44.7] ms), and significantly higher postoperative pain scores (3.5 [0.0–5.5] vs. 0.0 [0.0–0.0]) in the GA compared to the SA group. These findings suggest that SA has advantages over GA for bladder hydrodistention in preventing an abrupt increase in SBP and postoperative pain in IC/BPS patients.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Abrams P(2003)The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society Urology 61 37-49
[2]  
Cardozo L(2012)Comparison of an interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome clinical cohort with symptomatic community women from the RAND Interstitial Cystitis Epidemiology study J. Urol. 187 508-512
[3]  
Fall M(2019)Molecular pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome based on gene expression J. Cell Physiol. 234 12301-12308
[4]  
Konkle KS(2016)Clinical guidelines for interstitial cystitis and hypersensitive bladder updated in 2015 Int. J. Urol. 23 542-549
[5]  
Berry SH(2009)Comparison of intravesical botulinum toxin type A injections plus hydrodistention with hydrodistention alone for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome BJU Int. 104 657-661
[6]  
Elliott MN(2021)Long-term outcomes of ulcerative interstitial cystitis after complete transurethral resection with therapeutic hydrodistention Int. Urol. Nephrol. 53 219-227
[7]  
Karamali M(2015)Role of cystoscopy and hydrodistention in the diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome Transl. Androl. Urol. 4 624-628
[8]  
Shafabakhsh R(2012)Autonomic response during bladder hydrodistention in patients with bladder pain syndrome J. Urol. 188 117-121
[9]  
Ghanbari Z(2009)Japanese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis Int. J. Urol. 16 4-16
[10]  
Homma Y(2017)Autonomic response during bladder hydrodistention reflects the severity of symptoms in patients with bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis Neurourol. Urodyn. 36 677-682