Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in INTERMACS-1 patients

被引:0
|
作者
Harveen K. Lamba
Mary Kim
Adriana Santiago
Samuel Hudson
Andrew B. Civitello
Ajith P. Nair
Gabriel Loor
Alexis E. Shafii
Kenneth K. Liao
Subhasis Chatterjee
机构
[1] Baylor College of Medicine,Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery
[2] Texas Heart Institute,Department of Cardiopulmonary Transplantation and the Center for Cardiac Support
[3] Baylor College of Medicine,Division of General Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery
[4] Baylor College of Medicine,Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery
[5] Texas Heart Institute,Division of Cardiovascular Surgery
来源
Journal of Artificial Organs | 2022年 / 25卷
关键词
Ventricular assist device; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Extracorporeal life support; Heart failure; Shock; Heart assist devices;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as destination therapy or as a bridge to future cardiac transplant in patients with end-stage heart failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used to bridge patients in cardiogenic shock or with decompensated heart failure to durable mechanical circulatory support. We assessed outcomes in patients in critical cardiogenic shock (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1) who underwent implantation of a continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, with or without preoperative ECMO bridging. For this retrospective study, we selected INTERMACS profile 1 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at our institution between Sep 1, 2004 and Nov 30, 2018. Of 768 patients identified, 133 (17.3%) were INTERMACS profile 1; 26 (19.5%) received preoperative ECMO support, and 107 (80.5%) did not. Postimplantation outcomes were compared between the ECMO and no-ECMO groups. No significant differences were found in 30-day mortality (15.4 vs. 15.9%, P = 0.95) or survival at 1 year (53.8 vs. 60.9%, P = 0.51). Three patients who received ECMO before CF-LVAD implantation subsequently underwent cardiac transplant. In the ECMO group, the lactate level 1 day after ECMO initiation was lower in survivors than nonsurvivors (2.7 ± 2.2 vs. 7.4 ± 4.2 mmol/L, P = 0.02; area under the curve = 0.85, P = 0.01) after CF-LVAD implantation. Bridging with ECMO to CF-LVAD implantation in carefully selected INTERMACS profile 1 patients (those who are at the highest risk for critical cardiogenic shock and for whom palliation may be the only other option) produced acceptable postoperative outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy in perioperative management of left ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients
    Maldonado, Yasdet
    Singh, Saket
    Taylor, Mark A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 27 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [32] Quality of Life and Mid-Term Survival of Patients Bridged with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Unai, Shinya
    Yamane, Kentaro
    Tanaka, Daizo
    Cook, Gary
    Hirose, Hitoshi
    Cavarocchi, Nicholas C.
    Entwistle, John W. C., III
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2017, 63 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [33] Minimally invasive implantation of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit used as a temporary left ventricular assist device: a new concept for bridging to permanent cardiac support
    Shunsuke Saito
    Bernhard Fleischer
    Christoph Maeß
    Hassina Baraki
    Ingo Kutschka
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2015, 18 : 95 - 98
  • [34] Long-Term Outcome After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Left Ventricular Assist Device Preceding Heart Transplantation
    Coeckelenbergh, Sean
    Valente, Federica
    Mortier, Julien
    Engelman, Edgard
    Roussoulieres, Ana
    El Oumeiri, Bachar
    Antoine, Martine
    Van Obbergh, Luc
    Taccone, Fabio Silvio
    Vanden Eynden, Frederic
    Stefanidis, Constantin
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (06) : 1694 - 1702
  • [35] Defining Vasoplegia Following Durable, Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Swan, Joshua T.
    Iso, Tomona
    Rizk, Elsie
    Trachtenberg, Barry H.
    Krisl, Jill
    Varnado, Sara
    Suki, Wadi N.
    Frost, Adaani E.
    Suarez, Erik
    Uddin, Faisal S.
    Kassi, Mahwash
    Giesecke, Noel Martin
    Bhimaraj, Arvind
    Masud, Faisal N.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [36] Radiographic appearance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenations versus left ventricular assist device
    Mackie, Phillip M.
    Peek, Giles J.
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    Bleiweis, Mark S.
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2021, 31 (05) : 831 - 832
  • [37] How to Manage Ventricular Arrhythmia Following Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [38] Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation
    Koeckert, Michael
    Vining, Patrick
    Reyentovich, Alex
    Katz, Stuart D.
    DeAnda, Abe, Jr.
    Philipson, Stefanie
    Balsam, Leora B.
    HEART & LUNG, 2017, 46 (02): : 74 - 78
  • [39] Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Right Ventricular Failure Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An INTERMACS Analysis
    Chamogeorgakis, Themistokles
    Toumpoulis, Ioannis
    Bonios, Michael J.
    Lanfear, David
    Williams, Celeste
    Koliopoulou, Antigoni
    Cowger, Jennifer
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2024, 70 (04) : 264 - 271
  • [40] Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients after left ventricular reconstruction
    Palmen, Meindert
    Braun, Jerry
    Beeres, Saskia L. M. A.
    Klautz, Robert J. M.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 23 (06) : 979 - 981