Robotic kidney implantation for kidney transplantation: Initial experience

被引:4
作者
Hagen M.E. [1 ]
Pugin F. [1 ]
Bucher P. [1 ]
Fasel J. [2 ]
Markar S. [3 ]
Morel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Geneva, 1211 Geneva
[2] Division of Anatomy, University of Geneva, Geneva
[3] General Surgery Department, University College London Hospital, London
关键词
Da Vinci; Kidney transplantation; New technology; Robotic surgery; Transplantation;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-010-0221-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite improvements in minimally invasive techniques over recent decades, kidney implantation into the iliac fossa has remained a domain of open surgery. However, it was hypothesized that it would be feasible to perform robotic transplant kidney implantation as a means of reducing surgical trauma. Two robotic kidney transplantations into the iliac fossa were attempted in human cadavers. In the first cadaver, a 5 cm incision was placed in the right lower abdomen, the peritoneum was mobilized in a cranial direction, the iliac vessels were identified, and the kidney placed in the pre-peritoneal space. The incision was sealed with a gel port through which the Vinci© Surgical System was installed. In the second cadaver, a robotic kidney implantation with robotically sutured vascular and ureteric anastomoses was performed trans-abdominally. Open incision, identification, placement of gel port, and robotic docking were feasible. Robotic performance of vascular anastomosis was not possible in the first cadaver because of advanced decay and excess fat in the surgical field. Robotic kidney positioning was feasible and anastomoses were performed successfully in the second cadaver within 35, 25, and 20 min (arterial, venous, and ureteric, respectively). Robotic kidney transplantation seems feasible in human cadavers if tissue condition is suitable, but is very technically challenging. Because of the delicacy of anatomical structures, the cadaveric model with the risk of advanced decay and the absence of circulation sets limits on the exploration of this complex procedure. Hence, further research and animal work in this area is critical to improve understanding of the benefits and limitations of robotic kidney implantation. © 2010 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Humar A., Matas A.J., Surgical complications after kidney transplantation, Semin Dial, 18, pp. 505-510, (2005)
  • [2] Hernandez D., Rufino M., Armas S., Gonzalez A., Gutierrez P., Barbero P., Vivancos S., Rodriguez C., de Vera J.R., Torres A., Retrospective analysis of surgical complications following cadaveric kidney transplantation in the modern transplant era, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 21, pp. 2908-2915, (2006)
  • [3] Flechner S.M., Zhou L., Derweesh I., Mastroianni B., Savas K., Goldfarb D., Modlin C.S., Krishnamurthi V., Novick A., The impact of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids on wound healing in 513 kidney-transplant recipients, Transplantation, 76, pp. 1729-1734, (2003)
  • [4] Goel M., Flechner S.M., Zhou L., Mastroianni B., Savas K., Derweesh I., Patel P., Modlin C., Goldfarb D., Novick A.C., The influence of various maintenance immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocele formation and treatment after kidney transplantation, J Urol, 171, pp. 1788-1792, (2004)
  • [5] Humar A., Ramcharan T., Denny R., Gillingham K.J., Payne W.D., Matas A.J., Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?, Transplantation, 72, pp. 1920-1923, (2001)
  • [6] Hernandez D., Rufino M., Bartolomei S., Gonzalez-Rinne A., Lorenzo V., Cobo M., Torres A., Clinical impact of preexisting vascular calcifications on mortality after renal transplantation, Kidney Int, 67, pp. 2015-2020, (2005)
  • [7] Hagen M.E., Inan I., Pugin F., Morel P., The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery, Rev Med Suisse, 3, pp. 1622-1626, (2007)
  • [8] Hagen M.E., Wagner O.J., Inan I., Morel P., Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci<sup>®</sup> surgical system, Int J Med Robot, 5, 3, pp. 327-331, (2009)
  • [9] Horgan S., Vanuno D., Robots in laparoscopic surgery, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 11, pp. 415-419, (2001)
  • [10] Sanchez B.R., Mohr C.J., Morton J.M., Safadi B.Y., Alami R.S., Curet M.J., Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 1, pp. 549-554, (2005)