Does the effect of comprehensive respiratory physiotherapy home-program differ in children with cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis?

被引:0
作者
Hulya Nilgun Gurses
Hikmet Ucgun
Melih Zeren
Hilal Denizoglu Kulli
Erkan Cakır
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakıf University,Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Bezmialem Vakıf University,Department of Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[3] Biruni University,Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[4] Izmir Bakircay University,Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[5] Istanbul Atlas University,Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences
[6] Bezmialem Vakif University,Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine
来源
European Journal of Pediatrics | 2022年 / 181卷
关键词
Cystic fibrosis; Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis; Respiratory physiotherapy; Pulmonary function; Exercise capacity; Respiratory and peripheral muscle strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bronchiectasis is a form of airway damage as a consequence of endobronchial infection and inflammation and may be present in different diseases. The underlying aetiologies include both cystic fibrosis (CF) and a group of non-cystic fibrosis diseases (NCFB) such as immunodeficiency, primary ciliary dyskinesia, or severe pulmonary infection. Although children with CF and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) have many similar clinical features, their responses to exercise may be different. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a comprehensive respiratory physiotherapy (CRP) home-program in children with CF and NCFB. Thirty children with CF and thirty children with NCFB were included in the study. Both groups performed the CRP home-program twice daily for 8 weeks. Pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of training. Both groups experienced significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength (p < 0.001). Maximum expiratory pressure, exercise capacity, and peripheral muscle strength were further improved in NCFB group compared to CF (p < 0.05); however, there was a great variability in the improvements for each variable.
引用
收藏
页码:2961 / 2970
页数:9
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]  
Bush A(2006)Mucus properties in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia: comparison with cystic fibrosis Chest 129 118-123
[2]  
Payne D(2020)Do pulmonary and extrapulmonary features differ among cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, and healthy children? Pediatr Pulmonol 55 3067-3073
[3]  
Pike S(2011)Skeletal muscle metabolism in cystic fibrosis and primary ciliary dyskinesia Pediatr Res 69 40-45
[4]  
Jenkins G(2014)European cystic fibrosis society standards of care: best practice guidelines J Cyst Fibros 13 S23-S42
[5]  
Henke MO(2011)Primary care summary of the British Thoracic Society Guideline on the management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis Prim Care Respir J 20 135-140
[6]  
Rubin BK(2009)A randomised crossover trial of chest physiotherapy in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis Eur Respir J 34 1086-1092
[7]  
Denizoglu Kulli H(2016)Using cystic fibrosis therapies for non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis Clin Chest Med 37 139-146
[8]  
Gurses HN(2009)The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient Intern Med J 39 495-501
[9]  
Zeren M(2007)New reference values for forced spirometry in white adults in Brazil J Bras Pneumol 33 397-406
[10]  
Ucgun H(2007)Six-minute walk test in children and adolescents J Pediatr 150 395-9.e2