Prospects of gatekeeping in German social health insurance

被引:2
作者
S. Greß
F. Hessel
S. Schulze
J. Wasem
机构
[1] University of Duisburg-Essen,Institute for Health Care Management
[2] AOK Research Institute,undefined
关键词
Social Health insurance; Primary care; Gatekeeping; Germany;
D O I
10.1007/s10389-004-0045-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
From 2004, German social health insurers are bound by law to offer their insured a gatekeeping option. In return for renouncing direct access to specialist care, the insured can be granted bonus payments by their social health insurer. So far, experience with gatekeeping is very limited in Germany. In social health insurance, sickness funds are very reluctant to offer gatekeeping, although this was already legally possible before 2004. In the private health insurance sector, cost savings in gatekeeping tariffs are probably the result of self-selection of the insured rather than more cost-efficient provision of health care services. International experience does not prove that gatekeeping results in cost savings or a better patient–physician relationship. Although in countries with a strong primary care system there is a higher life expectancy, gatekeeping is not the only factor to bring about this effect. It is not to be expected that the new legislation will result in a major proliferation of gatekeeping options in German social health insurance. Either the gatekeeping options will not be attractive for the insured or sickness funds will use gatekeeping options as an instrument for risk selection.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 258
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Measuring customer preferences in the German statutory health insurance [J].
Jonas B. Pendzialek ;
Dusan Simic ;
Stephanie Stock .
The European Journal of Health Economics, 2017, 18 :831-845
[22]   Measuring customer preferences in the German statutory health insurance [J].
Pendzialek, Jonas B. ;
Simic, Dusan ;
Stock, Stephanie .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 18 (07) :831-845
[23]   The Philippines' National Health Insurance Act: A German perspective [J].
Busse, R ;
Schwartz, FW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 12 (02) :131-148
[24]   Health Promotion Financing With Mongolia's Social Health Insurance [J].
Bayarsaikhan, Dorjsuren ;
Nakamura, Keiko .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 27 (02) :NP887-NP896
[25]   Health Promotion Financing With Mongolia's Social Health Insurance [J].
Bayarsaikhan, Dorjsuren ;
Nakamura, Keiko .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 21 (04) :399-409
[26]   UTILIZATION OF SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE FOR MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES IN THE PHILIPPINES [J].
Reyes, Katherine Ann, V ;
Verdolaga, Ria Mae C. ;
Wee-Co, Pura Angela ;
Cloma-Rosales, Venus ;
Yason-Remonte, Mary Antonette ;
Silvestre, Maria Asuncion A. ;
Castillo, Mariella .
SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 51 :108-125
[27]   Costs of ulcerative colitis within the German Statutory Health Insurance [J].
Prenzler, A. ;
Bokemeyer, B. ;
Mittendorf, T. ;
von der Schulenburg, J.-M. Graf .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (07) :281-286
[28]   Responding to the challenges of social health insurance in African countries [J].
Tetteh, Ebenezer Kwabena .
DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2012, 29 (05) :657-680
[29]   The Impact of Social Health Insurance on Household Fertility Decisions [J].
Abrokwah, Stephen O. ;
Moser, Christine M. ;
Norton, Edward .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2016, 25 (05) :699-717
[30]   Willingness to Pay for Social Health Insurance in Central Vietnam [J].
Lan Hoang Nguyen ;
Anh Thuan Duc Hoang .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 5