Flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake susceptibility maps using machine learning techniques and their combination

被引:0
作者
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Soheila Pouyan
Mojgan Bordbar
Foroogh Golkar
John J. Clague
机构
[1] Shiraz University,Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, College of Agriculture
[2] Islamic Azad University,Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch
[3] Shiraz University,Department of Water Engineering and Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Center, College of Agriculture
[4] Simon Fraser University,Department of Earth Sciences, Institute for Quaternary Research
[5] University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”,Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies
来源
Natural Hazards | 2023年 / 116卷
关键词
Multi-hazards; Land-use planning; Hazard management; Machine learning methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Protection against natural hazards (i.e., floods, landslides, forest fires, and earthquakes) is vital in land-use planning, especially in high-risk areas. Multi-hazard susceptibility maps can be used by land-use manager to guide urban development, to minimize the risk of natural disasters. The objective of the present study was to use four machine learning models to produce multi-hazard susceptibility maps in Khuzestan Province, Iran. In this work, four different natural hazards (flood, landslides, forest fire, and earthquake) using support vector machine (SVM), boosted regression tree (BRT), random forest (RF), and maximum entropy (MaxEnt) techniques were created. Effective factors used in the study include elevation, slope degree, slope aspect, rainfall, temperature, lithology, land use, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), wind exposition index (WEI), topographic wetness index (TWI), plan curvature, drainage density, distance from roads, distance from rivers, and distance from villages. The spatial earthquake hazard in the study area was derived from a peak ground acceleration (PGA) susceptibility map. The second step in the study was to combine the model-generated maps of the four hazards in a reliable multi-hazard map. The mean decrease Gini (MDG) method was used to determine the level of importance of each effective factor on the occurrence of landslides, floods, and forest fires. Finally, “area under the curve” (AUC) values were calculated to validate the forest fire, flood, and landslide susceptibility maps and to compare the predictive capability of the machine learning models. The RF model yielded the highest AUC values for the forest fire, flood, and landslide susceptibility maps, specifically, 0.81, 0.85, and 0.94, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:3797 / 3816
页数:19
相关论文
共 284 条
[1]  
Aertsen W(2010)Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests Ecol Model 221 1119-1130
[2]  
Kint V(2017)Impact of climate variability on the occurrence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Khuzestan Province, southwestern Iran Geospat Health 12 1-134
[3]  
Van Orshoven J(2017)Suitability estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map Sci Total Environ 575 119-32
[4]  
Özkan K(2001)Random forests Mach Learn 45 5-106
[5]  
Muys B(2000)Creating hazard resilient communities through land-use planning Nat Hazards Rev 1 99-2096
[6]  
Azimi F(2020)Flood risk assessment for Davao Oriental in the Philippines using geographic information system-based multi-criteria analysis and the maximum entropy model J Flood Risk Manag 13 12607-1606
[7]  
Shirian S(2020)Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods Sci Total Environ 701 134979-955
[8]  
Jangjoo S(2019)An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines Sci Total Environ 651 2087-28
[9]  
Ai A(1968)Engineering seismic risk analysis Bull Seismol Soc Am 58 1583-1073
[10]  
Abbasi T(2017)Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping based on statistical index, certainty factors, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models Geocarto Int 32 935-380