Performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion, and modified Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion compared to reference broth microdilution for testing tigecycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in a multicenter study in China

被引:5
作者
Dandan Yin
Yan Guo
Min Li
Wenjuan Wu
Jin Tang
Ying Liu
Feng Chen
Yuxing Ni
Jingyong Sun
Hong Zhang
Hu Zhao
Fupin Hu
机构
[1] Fudan University,Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital
[2] Ministry of Health,Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics
[3] Shanghai Jiaotong University,Renji Hospital, School of Medicine
[4] Tongji University,Shanghai East Hospital
[5] Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine
[6] Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine
[7] Shanghai Jiaotong University,Children’s Hospital of Shanghai
[8] Shanghai Jiaotong University,Huadong hospital
[9] Fudan University,undefined
来源
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | 2021年 / 40卷
关键词
Tigecycline; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Modified disk diffusion; Carbapenem-resistant ; Carbapenem-resistant ; Categorical agreement; Very major error; Major error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tigecycline is an alternative antibiotic for managing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, disk diffusion and automated testing often show false-intermediate or false-resistant results in tigecycline susceptibility, misleading clinical antimicrobial therapy. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the reference method for testing tigecycline susceptibility, but it is labor intensive and time consuming to perform in clinical laboratories. Therefore, a simple and accurate method is urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion (KB), and modified KB disk diffusion (mKB) versus BMD in testing tigecycline susceptibility of 372 strains of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and 346 strains of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). BMD confirmed that 96.8% of CRKP and 91% of CRAB strains were susceptible to tigecycline. E-test, VITEK 2, KB, and mKB yielded categorical agreement of 96.7/59.3%, 69.9/54.3%, 78.5/87.3%, and 96.5%/91% for CRKP/CRAB, respectively. No very major error was found for either CRKP or CRAB by any method. No major error was found for CRKP or CRAB by the mKB method. The mKB method enhanced by R-buffer is simple, accurate, and inexpensive for clinical laboratories to test the susceptibility of CRKP and CRAB isolates to tigecycline.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1154
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Logan LK(2017)The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace J Infect Dis 215 S28-S36
[2]  
Weinstein RA(2018)High-dose tigecycline for the treatment of nosocomial carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: a retrospective cohort study Medicine (Baltimore) 97 e9961-508
[3]  
Geng TT(2016)Tigecycline treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis Medicine (Baltimore) 95 e3126-881
[4]  
Xu X(2014)Are E-test and Vitek2 good choices for tigecycline susceptibility testing when comparing broth microdilution for MDR and XDR Acinetobacter baumannii? New Microbiol 37 503-3730
[5]  
Huang M(2016)False non-susceptible results of tigecycline susceptibility testing against Enterobacteriaceae by an automated system: a multicentre study J Med Microbiol 65 877-230
[6]  
Ni W(2007)Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2, disk diffusion, E-test, broth microdilution, and agar dilution susceptibility testing methods for colistin in clinical isolates, including hetero resistant Enterobacter cloacae and Acinetobacter baumannii strains Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51 3726-79
[7]  
Han Y(2007)Multicenter studies of tigecycline disk diffusion susceptibility results for Acinetobacter spp J Clin Microbiol 45 227-6985
[8]  
Liu J(2015)Comparative evaluation of tigecycline susceptibility testing methods for J Glob Antimicrob Resist 3 75-1712
[9]  
Grandesso S(2014) and Enterobacteriaceae Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58 6982-646
[10]  
Sapino B(2014)Mechanisms of tigecycline resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58 1707-6156