The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: a clinical review

被引:0
作者
Andrea Fiorillo
Stefano Barlati
Antonello Bellomo
Giulio Corrivetti
Giuseppe Nicolò
Gaia Sampogna
Valentina Stanga
Franco Veltro
Giuseppe Maina
Antonio Vita
机构
[1] University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli,Department of Psychiatry
[2] ASST Spedali Civili,Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services
[3] University of Brescia,Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences
[4] University of Foggia,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatric Unit
[5] Department of Mental Health,Department of Mental Health Colleferro
[6] ASL Roma G,Department of Neuroscience
[7] Mental Health Department of Campobasso,undefined
[8] University of Torino,undefined
来源
Annals of General Psychiatry | / 19卷
关键词
Shared decision-making; Recovery; Empowerment; Adherence; Schizophrenia; Long-acting injectable antipsychotics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which the doctor provides clear and complete medical information to patients about their treatment, and patients provide information on his/her preferences. Patients and clinicians bring different, but equally important, knowledge to the decision-making process. Through the adoption of SDM, it should be possible to overcome the barriers that hinder the acceptance of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) by patients, and often also by psychiatrists. The present paper is a critical appraisal of recent literature on the impact of SDM in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments and in implementing the use of LAIs in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. SDM is recognized as a promising strategy to improve collaboration between clinicians and patients in achieving recovery. When considering drug treatments, clinicians must evaluate the patient’s preferences, expectations and concerns towards the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Moreover, an active involvement in the decision process could reduce the patient’s perception of being coerced into the use of LAIs. Involving patients in the choice of therapy is not sufficient to increase pharmacological adherence if, at the same time, there is no constant work of comparison and communication with the reference psychiatric team. SDM can be particularly effective for LAI prescription, since patient can have prejudices and unjustified fears related to the LAI formulation, which the doctor must resolve.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 362 条
[1]  
Tiffen J(2014)Enhancing clinical decision making: development of a contiguous definition and conceptual framework J Prof Nurs 30 399-405
[2]  
Corbridge S(2017)Shared decision making: everyone wants it, so why isn’t it happening? World Psychiatry 16 117-118
[3]  
Slimmer L(2014)Predictors of shared decision making and level of agreement between consumers and providers in psychiatric care Community Ment Health J 50 375-382
[4]  
Coulter A(2017)Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care World Psychiatry 16 146-153
[5]  
Fukui S(2019)When does shared decision making is adopted in psychiatric clinical practice? Results from a European multicentric study Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 14 270-277
[6]  
Salyers MP(2015)How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update World Psychiatry 35 305-314
[7]  
Matthias MS(2012)Decision making in recovery-oriented mental health care Psychiatr Rehabil 35 39-46
[8]  
Slade M(2016)Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: an international longitudinal multicenter study Eur Psychiatry 50 363-370
[9]  
Luciano M(2015)Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe: a latent class analytic approach Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 17 16-22
[10]  
Sampogna G(2014)Shared decision-making in psychiatric medicines management Mental Health Practice 17 258-275