Quantification of Natural Fracture Surfaces Using Fractal Geometry

被引:0
作者
Kayhan Develi
Tayfun Babadagli
机构
[1] Istanbul Technical University,Department of Geology, Engineering Geology Division, ITU Maden Fak. Uyg. Jeol. Anabilim Dali
[2] Istanbul Technical University,Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas Eng. ITU Maden Fak. Petrol ve Dogal Gaz Muh. Bol.
来源
Mathematical Geology | 1998年 / 30卷
关键词
fractal dimension; natural fracture surfaces; roughness measurement device; self-affinity; variogram analysis; power spectral density analysis; roughness-length method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to present an extensive evaluation of the methods to calculate the fractal dimension of natural fracture surfaces. Three methods; variogram analysis (VA), power spectral density (PSD), and roughness-length method (RMS) are applied to 2-D surface data (PSD) and 1-D profiles (VA and RMS) extracted from the surface data of 54 mm diameter crystallized limestone samples. Surface topography of the samples is quantified through a newly designed fully automated device. Before the application, self-affinity of the surface roughness and the applicability of these methods are validated using synthetically generated fractal surfaces. Fractal dimension values of the profiles are obtained as between 1 and 1.5 with a few exceptions. VA and RMS methods yield consistent fractal dimensions while the PSD values are lower than those of the other two methods. In terms of practical applicability, the VA is found more convenient than other two methods because there still exists shortcomings with the PSD and RMS methods due to difficulties in the mathematical analysis of the plots whose slopes are used in the computation of fractal dimension. However, it is observed that the data of limited size fracture surfaces are convenient for fractal analysis and the results are promising for further applications if the fracture surface size is restricted like cores recovered from deep boreholes.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 998
页数:27
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Aviles C. A.(1987)Fractal analysis applied to characteristic segments of the San Andreas fault Jour. Geophys. Res. 92 331-344
  • [2] Scholz C. H.(1973)Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints Engineering Geol. 7 287-332
  • [3] Boatwright J.(1980)On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A. 370 459-484
  • [4] Barton N.(1987)Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness Jour. Geophys. Res. 92 1337-1347
  • [5] Berry M. V.(1987)A note on the description of surface roughness using fractal dimension Geophys. Res. Lett. 14 1095-1098
  • [6] Lewis Z. V.(1985)Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces Jour. Geophys. Res. 90 12575-12582
  • [7] Brown S. R.(1989)Relationship between the fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficient Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 26 253-264
  • [8] Brown S. R.(1986)Computation of the fractal dimension of topographic surfaces using the triangular prism surface area method Computers & Geosciences 12 713-722
  • [9] Brown S. R.(1995)Difficulties with using continuous fractal theory for discontinuity surfaces Int. Jour. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 32 3-9
  • [10] Scholz C. H.(1989)Evaluating the fractal dimension of profiles Phys. Rev. A 39 1500-1512