The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach

被引:0
作者
Fortune Ganda
机构
[1] University of Limpopo,Faculty of Management and Law, School of Accountancy, Department of Financial Management
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Financial Development; Carbon emissions; Greenhouse gases; Environmental sustainability; Economic growth;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Financial development is often expressed as a private sector initiative earmarked towards motivating economic growth and mitigating poverty. Nonetheless, the need for economic development accompanied by high industrialisation and commercialisation strategies has generated natural environmental effects which have raised enormous concern to green interest groups about whether all the seventeen sustainable development goals will be achieved. This paper investigated the environmental effects of financial development in OECD countries from 2001 to 2012 by employing static models and system GMM analysis. The study utilised foreign direct investments, domestic credit to private sector by banks and domestic credit to private sector as the three proxies of financial development. The effects of these measures of financial development were examined on carbon emissions and greenhouse gases (indicators of environmental quality) and environmental sustainability. In this setting, the findings of the research spotlight that domestic credit to private sector by banks shows a negative and significant relationship with carbon emissions, greenhouse gases and sustainability. Conversely, domestic credit to private sector and economic growth indicates a positive and statistically significant relationship with carbon emissions, greenhouse gases and sustainability. Foreign direct investment is positive and significantly connected with carbon emissions and sustainability but only shows a positive and not significant link with greenhouse gases. The evidence suggested by this analysis adds that the financial system should continue to add more initiatives which consider natural environmental perspectives in their current operations. This present study also confirms the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in carbon emissions (turning point, $109,820), total greenhouse gases (turning point, $74,280) and sustainability (turning point, $112,505). The finding that the turning point of carbon emissions is higher than that of total greenhouse gases indicates why introducing initiatives designed to curb growth of carbon emissions in the respective OECD economies is important.
引用
收藏
页码:6758 / 6772
页数:14
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]  
Alam A(2015)Does financial development contribute to SAARC’S energy demand? From energy crisis to energy reforms Renew Sust Energ Rev 41 818-829
[2]  
Malik IA(2017)Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach Renew Sust Energ Rev 77 990-1000
[3]  
Abdullah AB(2015)Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation Ecol Indic 48 315-323
[4]  
Hassan A(2015)Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries Ecol Indic 52 16-22
[5]  
Awan U(1991)Some tests of specification in panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations Rev Econ Stat 58 277-291
[6]  
Ali G(2018)Exploring the link between environmental pollution and economic growth in EU-28 countries: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? PLoS One 13 104-110
[7]  
Zaman K(1996)Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment Environ Dev Econ 1 92-100
[8]  
Naseem I(2013)Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis Int J Scien Res Environ Sci 1 37-42
[9]  
Ali W(2016)The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pac Sci Rev B: Humanit Soc Sci 2 115-143
[10]  
Abdullah A(1998)Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models J Econ 87 33-41