Forecasting irregularly spaced UHF financial data: Realized volatility vs UHF-GARCH models

被引:13
作者
Racicot F.-E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Théoret R. [3 ]
Coën A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Administrative Sciences, University of Quebec-Outaouais (UQO), Gatineau, QC J8Y 3J5
[2] Laboratory for Research in Statistics and Probability (LRSP), Carleton University, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
[3] re et Organisationnelle, ESG-UQAM, Montreal, QC
[4] Department of Business Strategy, University of Quebec-Montréal (UQAM), Montreal, QC H2X-3X2, 315 est, Ste-Catherine
关键词
Daily VaR; Financial markets; Historical simulation; Realized volatility; Time deformation; UHF-GARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s11294-008-9134-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A new literature has been recently devoted to the modeling of ultra-high-frequency (UHF) data. Our first aim is to develop an empirical application of UHF-GARCH models to forecast future volatilities on irregularly spaced data. We also compare the out-sample performance of these generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (GARCH) models with the realized volatility method. We propose a procedure to account for the time deformation problem and show how to use these models for computing daily Value at Risk (VaR). © International Atlantic Economic Society 2008.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 124
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Andersen T.G., Bollerslev T., Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts, International Economic Review, 39, 4, pp. 885-905, (1998)
  • [2] Andersen T.G., Bollerslev T., Diebold F.X., Labys P., The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 453, pp. 42-55, (2001)
  • [3] Andersen T.G., Bollerslev T., Lange S., Forecasting financial market volatility: Sampling frequency vis-à-vis forecast horizon, Journal of Empirical Finance, 6, 5, pp. 457-477, (1999)
  • [4] Barndorff-Nielsen O.E., Shephard N., Non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models and their uses in financial economics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 63, 2, pp. 167-241, (2001)
  • [5] Barndorff-Nielsen O., Shephard N., Econometric analysis of realized volatility and its use in estimating stochastic volatility models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 64, 2, pp. 253-280, (2002)
  • [6] Barndorff-Nielsen O., Shephard N., Estimating quadratic variation using realized variance, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 5, pp. 457-477, (2002)
  • [7] Bollerslev T., Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 3, pp. 307-327, (1986)
  • [8] Bollerslev T., Wooldrige J., Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time varying covariances, Econometric Reviews, 11, 2, pp. 143-172, (1992)
  • [9] Bollerslev T., Wright J.H., High-frequency data, frequency domain inference, and volatility forecasting, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 4, pp. 596-602, (2001)
  • [10] Donaldson R.G., Kamstra M., An artificial neural network-GARCH model for international stock return volatility, Journal of Empirical Finance, 4, 1, pp. 17-46, (1997)