A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks — an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability

被引：0
作者：
Yingxuan Wang
Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
Per Nilsen
Vincent Chi-ho Chung
Yue Tian
Eng-Kiong Yeoh
机构：
[1] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Faculty of Medicine,Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care
[3] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences
[4] Linköping University,School of Chinese Medicine
[5] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,undefined
来源：
Implementation Science | / 18卷
关键词：
Implementation science; Implementation research; Theories; Models; Frameworks; Diffusion; Dissemination; Knowledge translation;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 470 条
[1]  
Eccles MP(2006)Welcome to implementation science Implement Sci 1 1-8
[2]  
Mittman BS(2015)Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks Implement Sci 10 53-10
[3]  
Nilsen P(2019)Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science Implement Sci 14 1-9
[4]  
Kislov R(2018)T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool Implement Sci 13 1-300
[5]  
Pope C(2017)Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey Implement Sci 12 1-350
[6]  
Martin GP(2010)A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: mapping the field Nurs Outlook 58 287-116
[7]  
Wilson PM(2012)Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research Am J Prev Med 43 337-102
[8]  
Birken SA(2017)Implementation frameworks in child, youth and family services–results from a scoping review Child Youth Serv Rev 81 101-14
[9]  
Rohweder CL(2017)Narrative review of frameworks for translating research evidence into policy and practice Public Health Res Pract 27 e2711704-11
[10]  
Powell BJ(2018)Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use J Clin Epidemiol 100 92-32
12345678910