Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

[11] Sheridan KC(2020)Better outcomes are associated with cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Medicine (Baltimore) 99 e18750-207

[12] Wasielewski RC(2016)Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24 3200-369

[13] Søballe K(2009)Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030 Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 2606-32

[14] Hansen ES(2001)Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 196-3553

[15] Brockstedt-Rasmussen H(2005)Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years Acta Orthop 76 362-58

[16] Bünger C(2003)Methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions Clin Orthop Relat Res 413 25-895

[17] Bobyn JD(2013)Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 471 3543-196

[18] Stackpool GJ(2015)To cement or not? Two-year results of a prospective, randomized study comparing cemented vs. cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) J Arthroplasty 30 55-674

[19] Hacking SA(2009)Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 889-376

[20] Tanzer M(2017)Long-term results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component: clinical and radiographic results at follow-up of 10 years Arthroplast Today 3 192-2985

[11] Sheridan KC(2020)Better outcomes are associated with cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Medicine (Baltimore) 99 e18750-207

[12] Wasielewski RC(2016)Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24 3200-369

[13] Søballe K(2009)Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030 Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 2606-32

[14] Hansen ES(2001)Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 196-3553

[15] Brockstedt-Rasmussen H(2005)Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years Acta Orthop 76 362-58

[16] Bünger C(2003)Methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions Clin Orthop Relat Res 413 25-895

[17] Bobyn JD(2013)Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial Clin Orthop Relat Res 471 3543-196

[18] Stackpool GJ(2015)To cement or not? Two-year results of a prospective, randomized study comparing cemented vs. cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) J Arthroplasty 30 55-674

[19] Hacking SA(2009)Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 889-376

[20] Tanzer M(2017)Long-term results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component: clinical and radiographic results at follow-up of 10 years Arthroplast Today 3 192-2985