Quorum-quenching limits quorum-sensing exploitation by signal-negative invaders

被引:0
|
作者
Mélanie Tannières
Julien Lang
Claudie Barnier
Jacqui A. Shykoff
Denis Faure
机构
[1] Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC),
[2] CNRS CEA Univ. Paris-Sud,undefined
[3] Université Paris-Saclay,undefined
[4] Avenue de la Terrasse,undefined
[5] Ecologie Systématique Evolution,undefined
[6] CNRS,undefined
[7] Univ. Paris-Sud,undefined
[8] AgroParisTech,undefined
[9] Université Paris-Saclay,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Some bacteria produce and perceive quorum-sensing (QS) signals that coordinate several behaviours, including the costly processes that are exoenzyme production and plasmid transfer. In the case of plasmid transfer, the emergence of QS signal-altered invaders and their policing are poorly documented. In Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the virulence Ti-plasmid encodes both synthesis and sensing of QS-signals, which promote its transfer from a donor to a recipient cell. Here, we reported that QS-altered A. tumefaciens mutants arose during experimental evolution. All showed improved growth compared to their ancestor. Genome sequencing revealed that, though some had lost the Ti-plasmid, most were defective for QS-signal synthesis and Ti-plasmid conjugation (traR mutations) and one exhibited a QS-signal exploitation behaviour, using signal produced by other cells to enhance its own Ti-plasmid transfer. We explored mechanisms that can limit this QS-hijacking. We showed that the A. tumefaciens capacity to inactivate QS-signals by expressing QS-degrading enzyme could attenuate dissemination of the QS signal-negative Ti-plasmids. This work shows that enzymatic QS-disruption whether encoded by the QS-producing Ti-plasmid itself, by a companion plasmid in the same donor cells, or by one in the recipient cells, in all cases can serve as a mechanism for controlling QS exploitation by QS signal-negative mutants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of a quorum-quenching enzyme on leaf litter decomposition
    Strickland, Michael S.
    McCulley, Rebecca L.
    Bradford, Mark A.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 64 : 65 - 67
  • [42] Reversible Signal Binding by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum-Sensing Signal Receptor LasR
    Sappington, Kala J.
    Dandekar, Ajai A.
    Oinuma, Ken-Ichi
    Greenberg, E. Peter
    MBIO, 2011, 2 (01):
  • [43] Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Network Architectures
    Ng, Wai-Leung
    Bassler, Bonnie L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2009, 43 : 197 - 222
  • [44] How to desynchronize quorum-sensing networks
    Russo, Giovanni
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2017, 95 (04)
  • [45] Quorum-sensing: The phenomenon of microbial communication
    Gera, C
    Srivastava, S
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2006, 90 (05): : 666 - 676
  • [46] Quorum-sensing of bacteria and its application
    Jiang G.
    Su M.
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2009, 8 (4) : 385 - 391
  • [47] In Silico Development of Quorum-Sensing Inhibitors
    Byeon, Jae-Young
    Sim, Jun
    Ryu, Eun-Ju
    Sim, Jaehyun
    Lee, Hwan
    Cho, Kwang-Hwi
    Choi, Bong-Kyu
    Lee, Julian
    BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 38 (07) : 728 - 734
  • [48] Quorum-sensing: The phenomenon of microbial communication
    Department of Genetics, University of Delhi, South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110 021, India
    Curr. Sci., 2006, 5 (666-676):
  • [49] The Mechanisms and Applications of Quorum Sensing (QS) and Quorum Quenching (QQ)
    Jingjing Zhang
    Tao Feng
    Jiayi Wang
    Yan Wang
    Xiao-Hua Zhang
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2019, 18 : 1427 - 1442
  • [50] Dissecting the quorum-sensing receptor LuxNe
    Bonneau, Richard
    CELL, 2008, 134 (03) : 390 - 391