Underground Mining Method Selection Using WPM and PROMETHEE

被引：15

作者：

Balusa B.C. ^{[1
]}

Singam J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Mining Engineering Department, National Institute Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, Odisha

来源：

Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D | 2018年 / 99卷 / 01期

关键词：

AHP; Multi-attribute decision making techniques; PROMETHEE; Underground mining method selection; WPM;

D O I：

10.1007/s40033-017-0137-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The aim of this paper is to represent the solution to the problem of selecting suitable underground mining method for the mining industry. It is achieved by using two multi-attribute decision making techniques. These two techniques are weighted product method (WPM) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). In this paper, analytic hierarchy process is used for weight’s calculation of the attributes (i.e. parameters which are used in this paper). Mining method selection depends on physical parameters, mechanical parameters, economical parameters and technical parameters. WPM and PROMETHEE techniques have the ability to consider the relationship between the parameters and mining methods. The proposed techniques give higher accuracy and faster computation capability when compared with other decision making techniques. The proposed techniques are presented to determine the effective mining method for bauxite mine. The results of these techniques are compared with methods used in the earlier research works. The results show, conventional cut and fill method is the most suitable mining method. © 2017, The Institution of Engineers (India).

引用

页码：165 / 171

页数：6

共 16 条

[1]

Azadeh A., Osanloo M., Ataei M., A new approach to mining method selection based on modifying the Nicholas technique, Appl. Soft Comput., 10, 4, pp. 1040-1061, (2010)

[2]

Alpay S., Yavuz M., A Decision Support System for Underground Mining Method Selection. International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, (2007)

[3]

Naghadehi M.Z., Mikaeil R., Ataei M., The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to selection of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 4, pp. 8218-8226, (2009)

[4]

Samimi Namin F., Et al., A new model for mining method selection of mineral deposit based on fuzzy decision making, J. South Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 108, 7, pp. 385-395, (2008)

[5]

Yavuz M., The application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Yager’s method in underground mining method selection problem, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ., 29, 6, pp. 453-475, (2015)

[6]

Shariati S., Abdolreza Y.-C., Behrang P.B., Mining method selection by using an integrated model, Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci., 6, 2, pp. 199-214, (2013)

[7]

Jamshidi M., Et al., The application of AHP approach to selection of optimum underground mining method, case study: Jajarm Bauxite Mine (Iran), Arch. Min. Sci., 54, 1, pp. 103-117, (2009)

[8]

Bogdanovic D., Nikolic D., Ilic I., Mining method selection by integrated AHP and PROMETHEE method, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 84, 1, pp. 219-233, (2012)

[9]

Romero Gelvez J.I., Cortes Aldana F.A., Mining method selection methodology by multiple criteria decision analysis-case study in Colombian coal mining, Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, 3, pp. 1-11, (2014)

[10]

Karimnia H., Bagloo H., Optimum mining method selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process–Qapiliq salt mine, Iran, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 25, 2, pp. 225-230, (2015)

← 1 2 →