Prospective systematic review registration: Perspective from the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N)

被引：12

作者：

Van der Wees P. ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
]}

Qaseem A. ^{[5
]}

Kaila M. ^{[6
]}

Ollenschlaeger G. ^{[7
]}

Rosenfeld R. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen

[2] School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht

[3] Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy, 3800 AE Amersfoort

[4] Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115

[5] Department of Clinical Policy, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA 19106

[6] Hjelt Institute, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki

[7] German Agency for Quality in Medicine AEZQ, 10623 Berlin

[8] Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center and Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11201

来源：

Systematic Reviews | / 1卷 / 1期

关键词：

guidelines; methods; reviews; systematic;

D O I：

10.1186/2046-4053-1-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Clinical practice and public health guidelines are important tools for translating research findings into practice with the aim of assisting health practitioners as well as patients and consumers in health behavior and healthcare decision-making. Numerous programs for guideline development exist around the world, with growing international collaboration to improve their quality. One of the key features in developing trustworthy guidelines is that recommendations should be based on high-quality systematic reviews of the best available evidence. The review process used by guideline developers to identify and grade relevant evidence for developing recommendations should be systematic, transparent and unbiased. In this paper, we provide an overview of current international developments in the field of practice guidelines and methods to develop guidelines, with a specific focus on the role of systematic reviews. The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) aims to stimulate collaboration between guideline developers and systematic reviewers to optimize the use of available evidence in guideline development and to increase efficiency in the guideline development process. Considering the significant benefit of systematic reviews for the guideline community, the G-I-N Board of Trustees supports the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) initiative. G-I-N also recently launched a Data Extraction Resource (GINDER) to present and share data extracted from individual studies in a standardized template. PROSPERO and GINDER are complementary tools to enhance collaboration between guideline developers and systematic reviewers to allow for alignment of activities and a reduction in duplication of effort. © 2012 Van der Wees et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

引用

共 33 条

[1]

Field M.J., Lohr K., Guidelines for Clinical Practice, from Development to Use, (1992)

[2]

Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust, (2011)

[3]

Grimshaw J., Freemantle N., Wallace S., Russell I., Hurwitz B., Watt I., Long A., Sheldon T., Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines, Qual Health Care, 4, pp. 55-64, (1995)

[4]

Grimshaw J.M., Russell I.T., Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice, Qual Health Care, 3, pp. 45-52, (1994)

[5]

Grol R., Grimshaw J., From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care, Lancet, 362, pp. 1225-1230, (2003)

[6]

Grol R., Wensing M., Eccles M., Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice, (2005)

[7]

Grimshaw J.M., Thomas R.E., MacLennan G., Fraser C., Ramsay C.R., Vale L., Whitty P., Eccles M.P., Matowe L., Shirran L., Wensing M., Dijkstra R., Donaldson C., Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies, Health Technol Assess, 8, 3-4, pp. 1-72, (2004)

[8]

Woolf S.H., Grol R., Hutchinson A., Eccles M., Grimshaw J., Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines, BMJ, 318, pp. 527-530, (1999)

[9]

Ollenschlager G., Marshall C., Qureshi S., Rosenbrand K., Burgers J., Makela M., Slutsky J., Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N), Qual Saf Health Care, 13, pp. 455-460, (2004)

[10]

Druss B.G., Marcus S.C., Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine, J Med Libr Assoc, 93, pp. 499-501, (2005)

← 1 2 3 4 →