What motivates deviant behavior in the workplace? An examination of the mechanisms by which procedural injustice affects deviance

被引:0
作者
Jesse S. Michel
Michael B. Hargis
机构
[1] Auburn University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Central Arkansas,Department of Marketing and Management
来源
Motivation and Emotion | 2017年 / 41卷
关键词
Aggression; Deviance; Motivation; Procedural injustice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research examines the motivational and social-cognitive processes underlying the procedural injustice and deviance relationship. Based on psychological need and self-determination theories, it was hypothesized that intrinsic motivation would mediate the relationship between procedural injustice and deviance. Based on the general aggression model and social-cognitive theory, it was hypothesized that this positive indirect effect would be moderated by dispositional aggression. Two studies were conducted, including multi-wave and multi-source data, to test these relationships through mediation and moderated mediation procedures. Results supported both hypotheses: intrinsic motivation mediated the procedural injustice and deviance relationship; and this positive indirect effect was moderated by dispositional aggression, such that higher levels of aggression increased the magnitude of the indirect effect. Results were consistent across multiple measures of intrinsic motivation, aggression, and deviance (self- and other-report). Theoretical and practical contributions include support for a process-based theory of deviant behavior in the workplace and organizational interventions aimed at enriching one’s job to develop greater feelings of intrinsic motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 68
页数:17
相关论文
共 214 条
[1]  
Amabile TM(1993)Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace Human Resource Management Review 3 185-201
[2]  
Ambrose ML(2002)Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 947-965
[3]  
Seabright MA(2002)Human aggression Annual Review of Psychology 53 27-51
[4]  
Schminke M(2004)Social status and aggressiveness as moderators of the relationship between interactional justice and workplace deviance Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 1001-1029
[5]  
Anderson CA(1986)The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-1182
[6]  
Bushman BJ(2011)Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 1459-1473
[7]  
Aquino K(2005)Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques Multivariate Behavioral Research 40 373-400
[8]  
Galperin BL(2000)Development of a measure of workplace deviance Journal of Applied Psychology 85 349-360
[9]  
Bennett RJ(2007)Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis Journal of Applied Psychology 92 410-424
[10]  
Baron RM(2006)Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review Psychological Bulletin 132 751-777