Mapping ecosystem functions to the valuation of ecosystem services: implications of species–habitat associations for coastal land-use decisions

被引:0
作者
James N. Sanchirico
Peter Mumby
机构
[1] University of California,Environmental Science and Policy
[2] Davis,Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, School of BioSciences
[3] University Fellow,undefined
[4] Resources for the Future,undefined
[5] University of Exeter,undefined
来源
Theoretical Ecology | 2009年 / 2卷
关键词
Bioeconomic; Ecosystem services; Mangroves; Coral reefs; Sea grass; Coastal land-use; Ontogenetic migrations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Habitats and the ecosystem services they provide are part of the world’s portfolio of natural capital assets. Like many components of this portfolio, it is difficult to assess the full economic value of these services, which tends to over-emphasize the value of extractive activities such as coastal development. Building on recent ecological studies of species–habitat linkages, we use a bioeconomic model to value multiple types of habitats as natural capital, using mangroves, sea grass, and coral reefs as our model system. We show how key ecological variables and processes, including obligate and facultative behaviors map into habitat values and how the valuation of these ecological processes can inform decisions regarding coastal development (habitat clearing). Our stylized modeling framework also provides a clear and concise road map for researchers interested in understanding how to make the link between ecosystem function, ecosystem service, and conservation policy decisions. Our findings also highlight the importance of additional ecological research into how species utilize habitats and that this research is not just important for ecological science, but it can and will influence ecosystem service values that, in turn, will impact coastal land-use decisions. While refining valuation methods is not necessarily going to lead to more rational coastal land-use decisions, it will improve our understanding on the ecological–economic mechanisms that contribute to the value of our natural capital assets.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Aburto-Oropeza O(2008)Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 10456-10459
  • [2] Ezcurra E(2002)Recruitment limitation, population regulation, and larval connectivity in reef fish metapopulations Ecology 83 1092-1104
  • [3] Armsworth PR(2006)The importance of chemical environmental cues for juvenile J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338 112-122
  • [4] Arvedlund M(2002) Forsskål (Lethrinidae, Teleostei) when settling into their first benthic habitat Science 297 950-953
  • [5] Takemura A(2000)Economic reasons for conserving wild nature Ecol Econ 35 47-61
  • [6] Balmford A(2007)Valuing the environment as input: applications to mangrove–fishery linkages Econ Policy 22 177-229
  • [7] Bruner A(2002)Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs Environ Resour Econ 21 343-367
  • [8] Barbier EB(2008)Do open access conditions affect the valuation of an externality? Estimating the welfare effects of mangrove–fishery linkages Science 319 321-323
  • [9] Barbier EB(2000)Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values Environ Sci Technol 34 1384-1389
  • [10] Barbier EB(1997)On measuring economic values for nature Ecol Econ 22 65-71