Almost 10 years of PET/MR attenuation correction: the effect on lesion quantification with PSMA: clinical evaluation on 200 prostate cancer patients

[1] Hafner S(1994)Fast imaging in liquids and solids with the Back-projection Low Angle ShoT (BLAST) technique Magn Reson Imaging 12 1047-1051

[2] Martinez-Moller A(2009)Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data J Nucl Med 50 520-526

[3] Schulz V(2010)Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38 138-152

[4] Samarin A(2012)PET/MR imaging of bone lesions - implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39 1154-1160

[5] Hofmann M(2011)MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods J Nucl Med 52 1392-1399

[6] Keereman V(2011)The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification Med Phys 38 6010-6019

[7] Van Holen R(2015)Whole-body PET/MR imaging: quantitative evaluation of a novel model-based MR attenuation correction method including bone J Nucl Med 56 1061-1066

[8] Mollet P(2018)Impact of improved attenuation correction featuring a bone atlas and truncation correction on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 642-653

[9] Vandenberghe S(2018)The effect of including bone in Dixon-based attenuation correction for 18F-fluciclovine PET/MRI of prostate cancer J Nucl Med 59 1913-1917

[10] Paulus DH(2010)The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction Med Phys 37 2804-2812

[1] Hafner S(1994)Fast imaging in liquids and solids with the Back-projection Low Angle ShoT (BLAST) technique Magn Reson Imaging 12 1047-1051

[2] Martinez-Moller A(2009)Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data J Nucl Med 50 520-526

[3] Schulz V(2010)Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38 138-152

[4] Samarin A(2012)PET/MR imaging of bone lesions - implications for PET quantification from imperfect attenuation correction Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39 1154-1160

[5] Hofmann M(2011)MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods J Nucl Med 52 1392-1399

[6] Keereman V(2011)The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification Med Phys 38 6010-6019

[7] Van Holen R(2015)Whole-body PET/MR imaging: quantitative evaluation of a novel model-based MR attenuation correction method including bone J Nucl Med 56 1061-1066

[8] Mollet P(2018)Impact of improved attenuation correction featuring a bone atlas and truncation correction on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45 642-653

[9] Vandenberghe S(2018)The effect of including bone in Dixon-based attenuation correction for 18F-fluciclovine PET/MRI of prostate cancer J Nucl Med 59 1913-1917

[10] Paulus DH(2010)The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction Med Phys 37 2804-2812