A science of integration: frameworks, processes, and products in a place-based, integrative study

被引:0
作者
Andrew Kliskey
Lilian Alessa
Sarah Wandersee
Paula Williams
Jamie Trammell
Jim Powell
Jess Grunblatt
Mark Wipfli
机构
[1] Center for Resilient Communities,Alaska Center for Conservation Science
[2] University of Idaho,Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, US Geological Survey
[3] University of Alaska Anchorage,undefined
[4] University of Alaska Anchorage,undefined
[5] University of Alaska Southeast,undefined
[6] University of Alaska Fairbanks,undefined
[7] Geographic Information Network of Alaska,undefined
[8] University of Alaska Fairbanks,undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2017年 / 12卷
关键词
Collaboration; Co-production of knowledge; Integrative research; Science of integration; Social-ecological systems; Sustainability science; Transdisciplinary science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Integrative research is increasingly a priority within the scientific community and is a central goal for the evolving field of sustainability science. While it is conceptually attractive, its successful implementation has been challenging and recent work suggests that the move towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in sustainability science is being only partially realized. To address this from the perspective of social-ecological systems (SES) research, we examine the process of conducting a science of integration within the Southcentral Alaska Test Case (SCTC) of Alaska-EPSCoR as a test-bed for this approach. The SCTC is part of a large, 5 year, interdisciplinary study investigating changing environments and adaptations to those changes in Alaska. In this paper, we review progress toward a science of integration and present our efforts to confront the practical issues of applying proposed integration frameworks. We: (1) define our integration framework; (2) describe the collaborative processes, including the co-development of science through stakeholder engagement and partnerships; and (3) illustrate potential products of integrative, social-ecological systems research. The approaches we use can also be applied outside of this particular framework. We highlight challenges and propose improvements for integration in sustainability science by addressing the need for common frameworks and improved contextual understanding. These insights may be useful for capacity-building for interdisciplinary projects that address complex real-world social and environmental problems.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 303
页数:10
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Alessa L(2012)The role of agent types in detecting and responding to environmental change Hum Organ 71 1-10
  • [2] Kliskey A(2008)Social–ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space Landsc Urban Plan 85 27-39
  • [3] Alessa L(2008)The Arctic water resources vulnerability index: an integrated assessment tool for community resilience and vulnerability with respect to freshwater Environ Manag 42 523-541
  • [4] Kliskey A(2009)Toward a typology for social-ecological systems Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5 31-41
  • [5] Brown G(2010)Forgetting freshwater: the effect of modernization on water values in remote Arctic communities Soc Nat Resour 23 254-268
  • [6] Alessa L(2010)Visualizing situational data: applying information fusion for detecting social-ecological events Soc Sci Comput Rev 4 1-18
  • [7] Kliskey A(2010)A framework to structure agent-based modeling data for social-ecological systems Struct Dyn: eJournal Anthropol Relat Sci 42 254-265
  • [8] Lammers R(2013)Solving problems in social-ecological systems: definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research Ambio 227 219-232
  • [9] Arp C(2006)Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes For Ecol Manag 8 733-761
  • [10] White D(2011)Assessing the impacts of local knowledge and technology on climate change vulnerability in remote communities Int J Environ Res Public Health 92 1-15