The fruits of irony: Gaining insight into how we make meaning of the world

被引:0
作者
van Goor R. [1 ]
Heyting F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education, Division of Philosophy and History of Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1090 GE
关键词
Brandom; Communication; Content; Context; Irony; Meaning-making; Philosophical insolvability; Philosophy of education; Rorty;
D O I
10.1007/s11217-006-9010-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many philosophers of education emphasise the impossibility to really 'solve' philosophical - and with that, educational - problems these days. Philosophers have been trying to give philosophy a new, constructive turn in the face of this insolvability. This paper focuses on irony-based approaches that try to exploit the very uncertainty of philosophical issues to further philosophical understanding. We will first briefly discuss a few highlights of historical uses of irony as a philosophical tool. Then we concentrate on two different interpretations of irony, formulated by Bransen and Rorty, that aim at gaining insight into how we make meaning of the world, while at the same time recognising that such an understanding would be impossible. After discussing some problematic aspects of these interpretations a third interpretation of irony is developed, based on a third view of the nature of meaning-making. Following these three interpretations, we will discuss their philosophical merits and the different kinds of insight they can produce for philosophy of education. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 496
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Adelman C., Over two years, what did Froebel say to Pestalozzi?, History of Education, 29, 2, pp. 103-114, (2000)
[2]  
Archard D., Children: Rights and Childhood, (1993)
[3]  
Biesta G.J.J., Say you want a revolution...Suggestions for the impossible future of critical pedagogy, Educational Theory, 48, 4, pp. 499-510, (1998)
[4]  
Brandom R.B., Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, (2000)
[5]  
Brandom R.B., Vocabularies of pragmatism: Synthesizing naturalism and historicism, Rorty and His Critics, pp. 156-183, (2000)
[6]  
Bransen J., The Antinomy of Thought: Maimonian Skepticism and the Relation Between Thoughts and Objects, (1991)
[7]  
Bransen J., Filosofie & Ironie. Fantastische Opmerkingen over De Toekomst Van Een Traditie, (1992)
[8]  
Bransen J., Jezelf Blijven, (2004)
[9]  
Brehony K.J., Introduction, History of Education, 29, 2, pp. 97-101, (2000)
[10]  
Colebrook C., Irony in the Work of Philosophy, (2002)