Reliability and validation of the Turkish adaptation of the mistake rumination scale

被引:0
作者
Fedai Kabadayi
Oğuz Mercan
机构
[1] Recep Tayyip Erdogan University,Faculty of Education, Department of Counseling and Guidance
[2] Alpu Ortaokulu,Ministry of National Education
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Mistake rumination scale; Turkish culture; Perfectionism; Adaptation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of Turkish adaptation of the Mistake Rumination Scale (MRS) in university students. The study group consisted of 372 participants from different faculties, aged between 17 and 39 years and mainly female. We first translated Turkish of the MRS. Then, we analyzed the scale in terms of reliability and validity. The findings indicated that the MRS–Turkish Form confirmed seven items in one factor with good factor loadings. Good fit values were determined with the MRS–Turkish Form. The MRS–TF has good reliability coefficients. The mistake rumination was moderately positively correlated with ruminative thought styles and moderately negatively correlated with cognitive control and flexibility. These results demonstrated that the MRS–Turkish Form can be validly and reliably performed to Turkish culture.
引用
收藏
页码:6429 / 6438
页数:9
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Altan-Atalay A(2020)Brief state rumination inventory (BSRI): A standardization study for Turkish speaking populations Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 42 1-11
[2]  
Kızılöz BK(2009)Ruminative thought style and depressed mood Journal of Clinical Psychology 65 1-19
[3]  
Dönger İ(2015)Turkish version of the Co-rumination Questionnaire: A validity and reliability study Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal 5 106-114
[4]  
Demiray D(1951)Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 16 297-334
[5]  
Brinker JK(2019)Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016 Psychological Bulletin 145 410-429
[6]  
Dozois DJ(2019)Cognitive control and cognitive flexibility in the context of stress: A scale adaptation Studies in Psychology 39 345-368
[7]  
Bugay A(2014)Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 36 165-176
[8]  
Erdur-Baker Ö(2010)The short version of ruminative response scale: Reliability, validity and its relation to psychological symptoms Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 5 2178-2181
[9]  
Cronbach LJ(2014)Psychometric properties of the metacognition scales about rumination in clinical and non-clinical Turkish samples Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 25 1-11
[10]  
Curran T(2006)Positive versus negative perfectionism in psychopathology: A comment on Slade and Owens’s dual process model Behavior Modification 30 472-495