Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial

[1] Crosby E(2002)Airway management after upper cervical spine injury: what have we learned? Can J Anaesth 49 733-44

[2] Brimacombe J(2000)Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers Anesth Analg 91 1274-8

[3] Keller C(2013)[Cervical spine movement during bag-mask ventilation] Masui 62 337-40

[4] Kunzel KH(2016)A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath((R)) Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation Anaesthesia 71 437-42

[5] Gaber O(2016)Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Br J Anaesth 116 27-36

[6] Boehler M(2015)Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization J Med Assoc Thai 98 63-9

[7] Puhringer F(2012)Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6 Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 476-81

[8] Hirabayashi Y(2005)Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope Anesth Analg 101 910-5

[9] Fujita A(2017)Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with King Vision video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study Minerva Anestesiol 83 1152-60

[10] Sugimoto H(2022)Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Novice Intubators: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Cureus 14 e29578-23

[1] Crosby E(2002)Airway management after upper cervical spine injury: what have we learned? Can J Anaesth 49 733-44

[2] Brimacombe J(2000)Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers Anesth Analg 91 1274-8

[3] Keller C(2013)[Cervical spine movement during bag-mask ventilation] Masui 62 337-40

[4] Kunzel KH(2016)A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath((R)) Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation Anaesthesia 71 437-42

[5] Gaber O(2016)Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Br J Anaesth 116 27-36

[6] Boehler M(2015)Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization J Med Assoc Thai 98 63-9

[7] Puhringer F(2012)Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6 Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 476-81

[8] Hirabayashi Y(2005)Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope Anesth Analg 101 910-5

[9] Fujita A(2017)Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with King Vision video laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy: a crossover randomized study Minerva Anestesiol 83 1152-60

[10] Sugimoto H(2022)Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Novice Intubators: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Cureus 14 e29578-23