The DSM-5 with Limited Prosocial Emotions Specifier for Conduct Disorder: a Systematic Literature Review

被引:0
作者
Olivier F. Colins
Lore Van Damme
Anne M. Hendriks
Giorgos Georgiou
机构
[1] Ghent University,Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Department of Special Needs Education
[2] Leiden University Medical Center,undefined
[3] Örebro University,undefined
[4] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,undefined
[5] University of Cyprus,undefined
[6] European University of Cyprus,undefined
来源
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | 2020年 / 42卷
关键词
Callous-unemotional traits; Specifier; Conduct disorder; Limited prosocial emotions; Subtypes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
DSM-5 added a categorically defined specifier (‘with Limited Prosocial Emotions’; LPE) for the diagnosis of conduct disorder (CD). This paper systematically reviews the evidence base for this specifier in children and adolescents who are diagnosed with CD. Computer-assisted searches were executed and identified 181 potentially relevant papers. Eventually, nine papers were included in this review, referring to eight unique samples. All studies constructed an LPE measure by pulling the same items from the same rating scales that were used in the development of the DSM-5 LPE specifier. The prevalence of youth with CD who met criteria for this novel LPE specifier (CD + LPE) ranged from 6.1% to 83.7%. The studies greatly varied in the features used to test the viability of the DSM-5 LPE specifier. The most commonly used features relate to severity of antisocial behavior, low neuroticism (or lack of anxiety and depression), and treatment responsiveness. Available work altogether showed that CD + LPE youth displayed higher levels of past antisocial behaviour than CD Only youth, but failed to reveal other group differences that corroborate with expectations. Effect sizes typically were in the small to moderate range, suggesting that the practical usefulness of the group differences is limited. Empirical work shows that this specifier should not be used for clinical decision-making when relying on items from measures that have been used in the development of the LPE specifier. Crucially, limitations that hallmark the few studies on the topic hamper any firm conclusion about the usefulness of the specifier.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 258
页数:10
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
Blair RJ(2013)The neurobiology of psychopathic traits in youths Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14 786-799
[2]  
Byrd AL(2018)Boys with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: Neural response to reward and punishment and associations with treatment response Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 30 51-59
[3]  
Hawes SW(2000)A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis Statistics in Medicine 19 3127-3131
[4]  
Burke JD(1997)Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for subtyping children with conduct problems Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatrty 36 233-241
[5]  
Loeber R(2016)The clinical usefulness of the DSM-5 specifier for conduct disorder outside of a research context Law and Human Behavior 40 310-318
[6]  
Pardini DA(2015)The DSM-5 with limited Prosocial emotions Specifier for conduct disorder among detained girls Law and Human Behavior 39 198-207
[7]  
Chinn S(2013)The usefulness of DSM-IV and DSM-5 conduct disorder subtyping in detained adolescents Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 201 736-743
[8]  
Christian RE(2014)A new measure to assess psychopathic personality in children: The child problematic traits inventory Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 36 4-21
[9]  
Frick PJ(2017)The prospective usefulness of callous-unemotional traits and conduct disorder in predicting treatment engagement among detained girls European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 26 75-85
[10]  
Hill NL(2003)Punishment insensitivity and parenting: Temperament and learning as interacting risks for antisocial behavior Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review 6 69-86