Hippocratic, religious, and secular ethics: The points of conflict

被引：0

作者：

Robert M. Veatch

机构：

[1] Georgetown University,The Kennedy Institute of Ethics

来源：

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics | 2012年 / 33卷

关键词：

Oath; Hippocratic Oath; Professional codes; Common morality; Convergence thesis;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The origins of professional ethical codes and oaths are explored. Their legitimacy and usefulness within the profession are questioned and an alternative ethical source is suggested. This source relies on a commonly shared, naturally knowable set of principles known as common morality.

引用

页码：33 / 43

页数：10

共 19 条

[1]

Roth Russell B(1971)Medicine’s ethical responsibilities Journal of the American Medical Association 215 1956-1968

[2]

Brock Lord Russell(1970)Euthanasia Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 63 661-663

[3]

Carey EJ(1928)The formal use of the Hippocratic Oath for medical students at commencement exercises Bulletin of the Association of American Medical Colleges 3 159-166

[4]

Irish DP(1965)Professional oaths in American medical colleges Journal of Chronic Diseases 18 175-189

[5]

McMurray DW(1982)Oath given by US and Canadian medical schools, 1977 Social Science and Medicine 66 115-120

[6]

Friedlander W(1997)Use of the Hippocratic Oath: A review of twentieth century practice and a content analysis of oath administered in medical schools in the US and Canada in 1993 Journal of Clinical Ethics 8 377-388

[7]

Orr Robert D(2010)Medical school oath-taking: The moral controversy Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 335-345

[8]

Pang Norman(2004)The context of natural law: John Calvin’s doctrine of the two kingdoms Journal of Church and State 46 503-525

[9]

Pellegrino Edmund(2003)A defense of the common morality Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 259-274

[10]

Siegler Mark(2003)Consistency, common morality, and reflective equilibrium Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 231-258

← 1 2 →