Relationships Between the BRIEF/BRIEF-SR and Performance-Based Neuropsychological Tests in Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:0
作者
John W. Lace
Zachary C. Merz
Alex F. Grant
Carson L. Teague
Stephanie Aylward
Jill Dorflinger
Jeffrey D. Gfeller
机构
[1] Saint Louis University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of North Carolina,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[3] Chapel Hill,Department of Psychology
[4] Illinois Institute of Technology,Center for Pediatric Brain
[5] AMITA Health Neurosciences Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Neuropsychological testing; Behavioral rating scales; BRIEF; BRIEF-SR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical neuropsychologists typically use both performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales as part of comprehensive assessment. However, literature has suggested that performance-based tests account for limited variance in behavioral rating scales in healthy and clinical populations. Importantly, little work has investigated the relationships between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales in adolescent mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The present study was retrospective in nature and included 136 adolescents (M age = 14.97; 56% female) in the post-acute phase of recovery from mTBI (M days since injury = 33.4) referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Participants were administered a multi-domain neuropsychological test battery with measures of reaction time, processing speed, sustained attention, impulsivity, working memory, and verbal and visual memory, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and BRIEF-Self Report (BRIEF-SR). Results revealed mean neuropsychological test performance and parent- and self-reported executive dysfunction within the average range. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that performance-based test scores accounted for between 13 and 18% variance in BRIEF scores and between 8 and 14% variance in BRIEF-SR scores after controlling for demographic factors (which accounted for 3% variance in BRIEF scores and 7–10% variance in BRIEF-SR scores). Processing speed emerged as the most consistent significant individual predictor of BRIEF/BRIEF-SR scores across regression analyses. These findings build on previous literature by suggesting relatively limited psychometric overlap between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales, such that these approaches likely assess distinct and unique psychological constructs. Relationships to previous work, limitations of the current study, and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 176
页数:13
相关论文
共 368 条
[81]  
Laurent-Vannier A(2005)Gender differences in head-neck segment dynamic stabilization during head acceleration Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 37 272-827
[82]  
Chevignard MP(2008)Executive functions: performance-based measures and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Child Neuropsychology 15 53-303
[83]  
Soo C(2013)Practitioner review: do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54 131-225
[84]  
Galvin J(2008)A large-scale cross-sectional and longitudinal study into the ecological validity of neuropsychological test measures in neurologically intact people Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 23 787-14
[85]  
Catroppa C(1999)Neuropsychological, MRI and EEG findings after very mild traumatic brain injury Brain Injury 13 821-437
[86]  
Eren S(2002)The relationship between parental report on the BRIEF and performance-based measures of executive function in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury Child Neuropsychology 8 296-1005
[87]  
Colvin AC(2001)Developmental implications of early frontal-lobe damage: a case study Brain and Cognition 47 222-undefined
[88]  
Mullen J(2018)Executive function measures for children: A scoping review of ecological validity OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health 38 6-undefined
[89]  
Lovell MR(2006)The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 21 429-undefined
[90]  
Vereeke West R(2016)The clinical utility of the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II in traumatic brain injury Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 31 996-undefined