Relationships Between the BRIEF/BRIEF-SR and Performance-Based Neuropsychological Tests in Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:0
作者
John W. Lace
Zachary C. Merz
Alex F. Grant
Carson L. Teague
Stephanie Aylward
Jill Dorflinger
Jeffrey D. Gfeller
机构
[1] Saint Louis University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of North Carolina,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[3] Chapel Hill,Department of Psychology
[4] Illinois Institute of Technology,Center for Pediatric Brain
[5] AMITA Health Neurosciences Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Neuropsychological testing; Behavioral rating scales; BRIEF; BRIEF-SR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical neuropsychologists typically use both performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales as part of comprehensive assessment. However, literature has suggested that performance-based tests account for limited variance in behavioral rating scales in healthy and clinical populations. Importantly, little work has investigated the relationships between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales in adolescent mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The present study was retrospective in nature and included 136 adolescents (M age = 14.97; 56% female) in the post-acute phase of recovery from mTBI (M days since injury = 33.4) referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Participants were administered a multi-domain neuropsychological test battery with measures of reaction time, processing speed, sustained attention, impulsivity, working memory, and verbal and visual memory, and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and BRIEF-Self Report (BRIEF-SR). Results revealed mean neuropsychological test performance and parent- and self-reported executive dysfunction within the average range. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that performance-based test scores accounted for between 13 and 18% variance in BRIEF scores and between 8 and 14% variance in BRIEF-SR scores after controlling for demographic factors (which accounted for 3% variance in BRIEF scores and 7–10% variance in BRIEF-SR scores). Processing speed emerged as the most consistent significant individual predictor of BRIEF/BRIEF-SR scores across regression analyses. These findings build on previous literature by suggesting relatively limited psychometric overlap between performance-based tests and behavioral rating scales, such that these approaches likely assess distinct and unique psychological constructs. Relationships to previous work, limitations of the current study, and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 176
页数:13
相关论文
共 368 条
[41]  
Groninger L(2012)Mild Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2012 3-324
[42]  
Brandt J(1982)Development of a structured psychiatric interview for children: Agreement between child and parent on individual symptoms Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 10 307-132
[43]  
Berz K(2004)Adolescents’ performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: implications for the development of decision making and ventromedial prefrontal cortex Developmental Psychology 40 1148-204
[44]  
Divine J(2013)Contribution of rating scales to the assessment of executive functions Applied Neuropsychology: Child 2 125-467
[45]  
Foss KB(2014)Contribution of rating scales to intervention for executive dysfunction Applied Neuropsychology: Child 3 197-689
[46]  
Heyl R(2003)Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion The Clinical Neuropsychologist 17 460-90
[47]  
Ford KR(2005)Validity of ImPACT for measuring processing speed following sports-related concussion Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 27 683-534
[48]  
Myer GD(2017)Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review British Journal of Sports Medicine 51 941-263
[49]  
Bodnar LE(2019)Conceptualisation and use of executive functions in paediatrics: A scoping review of occupational therapy literature Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 66 77-e166
[50]  
Prahme MC(1998)Ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: focus on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 13 523-19